^This is why I think Xbox One's way of dealing with [url=http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-24-this-is-how-xbox-one-game-trade-ins-will-work-apparently]used games[/url] is a good thing.
[b]More money to the developers, less money to the middle man.[/b]
Edit: And don't say his points are invalid just because he's fat.
[quote]More money to the developers, less money to the middle man.[/quote]
But that's wrong, the more money will go to the publishers, devs lose out again.
Except the publishers get money from the first person who purchased that game. If this video was about GameStop ripping used game sellers off asking $5 for a $60 game, then I would be somewhat supportive. However this guy's argument is just people don't wanna spend an extra $5 (which I don't know how much GameStop sells used games where he lives, but it is usually $15-$20 off where I live so I don't accept that argument) in order to help out the publisher. I can understand wanting to help out the publisher and thank them for their great game, but isn't that their job? Honestly, I think that if it was a truly great game, they would have made a lot more money off of the new copies in the first couple weeks than the few copies that were sold later in the year. Also I don't believe he took into account if that game is off the market and people still wanna play it. How else but used games would someone legally obtain a copy of a game?
Well it's Boogie, he has a lot of valid points
But my problem with GameStop isn't their methods, nor is it their need to sell GameInformer subscriptions, because that's exaggerated to the nth degree
But I despise some of their staff, some of the biggest douchebags work there
Don't know a damn thing about games, but work there because its the hip thing to do, pff