{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由U920628编辑：
5/20/2013 2:12:19 PM
8
You think we've left the Ice Age behind? Fool.
The fact of the matter is that the earth has natural cycles.
We've been on the decline from an Ice Age for 10,000 years approx.
In 10'000 more years, the earth will start to freeze back up, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Remember [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling]Global Cooling[/url]?
Long range investigations predict global cooling, short range predict global warming, it's historical patterning, nothing new.
English
-
Mmmmm true, but not true in terms of this context. There have been satellite images taken from the 1900s to present day showing the increase of thermal imaging with relation to increase to C02 emissions etc. You're going to tell me thats one big coincidence?
-
CO₂ emission is a natural part of the progression of an oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere,it is followed by the ultimate cooling of the core, heating of the surface, destruction of the magnetosphere, unravelling of the atmosphere, stripping of life, and migration of water to the poles. These events are not all linked to CO₂ emission, just a part of the eventual decline process [i]it's[/i] linked to. One day, when Venus looks like our planet, our planet will look like Mars. For the meantime, have a beer and wait for the next Glacial Period.
-
[quote]You think we've left the Ice Age behind? Fool.[/quote] This has -blam!- all to do with the main issues with climate change in the next 50 years. [quote]The fact of the matter is that the earth has natural cycles. We've been on the decline from an Ice Age for 10,000 years approx.[/quote] Herp Derp climatologists never took this into account herp derp. Do you seriously think they overlooked this when they made their conclusions? [quote]In 10'000 more years, the earth will start to freeze back up, and there's nothing you can do about it.[/quote] Citation needed. [quote]Remember Global Cooling?[/quote] A poor scientific hypothesis based on little evidence? Where all new evidence says the exact opposite? (Global Warming) [quote]Long range investigations predict global cooling, [/quote] Define long range, because the Sun's steadily increasing solar activity will make the Earth uninhabitable in the "long term future" (around 1 billion years). [quote] short range predict global warming, [/quote] Thank you for conceding. [quote] it's historical patterning, nothing new.[/quote] AGW takes into account natural cycles. Are people seriously this ignorant?
-
由Quantum编辑： 5/21/2013 9:30:01 AMLOL NO. Global Cooling did not make headlines for 20 years. If you actually bothered to read the link, [i]it was a pure hypothesis. [/i] [quote]Don't be so quick to dismiss something just because it disagrees with you, as you are now doing.[/quote] The [i]irony[/i] of you posting this is so great that I could [i]outfit a Roman Legion[/i] with it.
