Charlie attacked him because he didn't like him or his opinion. There was more than one thread centered around him it. All the publicity and threads made Mitch seem like a terrible guy, when really all he did was snap back at Charlie and all the others that were hating on him because they were basically harassing just because him because he disagreed with them. I find it reidiculous that when Charlie harasses him and makes multiple threads about him, Charlie gets no punishment but when Mitch retaliates, he gets permabanned. I guess there is still some flood logic left on this forum.