[quote]They're still going on about Benghazi?[/quote]
Yes, because that was one of the biggest clusterf**ks during Obama's time in office, and Obama hasn't been held officially responsible. Clinton, who asked for more security, was quite literally thrown under the bus by the Administration.
[quote]So, the Tea Party won't be happy until Obama pretty much says it is his fault and he is impeached?[/quote]
Pretty much, but I'd be content if Obama admitted it was his fault or there was a Congressional investigation into Obama's role in the incident (then again, I'm not apart of the tea party). The one where they (congress) bitched at Clinton for a few days was pathetic, primarily because it wasn't her fault.
Even if Obama admits it was his fault (Which I don't know if it was, because none of us know who made the call), Tea Party won't stop there. Which is why I don't see why they continue to argue about this. They want their way or nothing, and Obama is pretty much refusing to give in.
Which I give him credit for.
Because 4 Americans died in an attack on an Embassy. They could have easily been saved, however the rescue forces were told to stand down.
How is that not f**ked?
Oh, it was a 'tragedy' (I consider SH Shooting a bigger tragedy, but that's another story), but it's been nearly eight months now. They aren't going to find anything they haven't already. Get over it.
Nonetheless they haven't done anything about it. 4 people died, in a very cruel way. Basically dragged through the streets and killed.
They haven't given us the full story as to why they let these people die.