First you would need a special talent for covering up pedophile rackets. Second a hatred for the Jewish people. Third you must be an old white guy, and forth, you have to hate women and contraception, and finally fifth you have to be able to wear a ridiculous hat and not be constantly laughing about how much money you are scamming people out of.
English
-
You are a testament to the moronic nature of any catholic who defends the catholic churches criminal and immoral activities. The Pope was directly involved in these cover ups. Not more then two weeks ago more documents were ordered by a court to be released by the vatican. It is no wonder he finally resigned. You cannot defend a man who holds the opinion of; oh yes, of course AIDS is bad, but not as bad as condoms.
-
That doesn't even make any sense!?!? I am the one making the claims. If my claims are indefensible, you have yet to demonstrate this. The word you are looking for my claims is undeniable. The Pope is an undeniable evil man, and he covered up criminal acts and tried to hide child abuse from the authorities. Not only this but he moved priests and allowed this abuse to continue. It is morally indefensible, and you have only helped me to prove this.
-
Not sure if you're just trolling now. http://www.stuartwilde.com/2013/02/popeseeks-immunity-protection-from-italian-president/#.UR2SyBbzf5a.facebook Why would someone who in innocent seek immunity from prosecution based on a child abuse scandal. To believe someone is infallible and good no matter what, is a disturbing thought. When the church is involved with such a huge scandal that is directly tied to the pope it is unequivocally an evil act, yet apologists such as yourself refuse to accept the possibility the the pope could do a bad thing. If I was the pope, and I killed an innocent person, because the fact that I'm pope makes it good? No, it is just a title, nothing more.