Always nerfing the most used options leaves permanent outliers, there is always going to be a gap because you took the lazy way out and nerfed instead of adjusted or brought others up to its level
Nerfs in a power fantasy game are redundant
If you want "Pulse Rifle Variety' has you claim you should be asking for buffs for the other archetypes ; nerfing the most popular pulses will just shift the meta with the same problem
In D1, all primaries were wittled down till Handcannons were the only choice, and crucible devolved into a choice between dying from Palindrome or dying from Eyasluna or using either Palindrome or Eyasluna, pick your poison with no variety to speak of
[quote]
In D1, all primaries were wittled down till Handcannons were the only choice, and crucible devolved into a choice between dying from Palindrome or dying from Eyasluna or using either Palindrome or Eyasluna, pick your poison with no variety to speak of[/quote]
People used Midas as well and those two pulses. Blind Perdition from trials and Clever dragon.
But I know what you mean.
I think 140s have been kept in check quite a bit by autos and pulses.
I'm not asking them to destroy pulses. Khvostov post nerf is still used more than Elsie's. I said make them demand more. But I'll test them out some and be more specific in my request.
[quote]Always nerfing the most used options leaves permanent outliers, there is always going to be a gap because you took the lazy way out and nerfed instead of adjusted or brought others up to its level
Nerfs in a power fantasy game are redundant
If you want "Pulse Rifle Variety' has you claim you should be asking for buffs for the other archetypes ; nerfing the most popular pulses will just shift the meta with the same problem[/quote]
If they do that, they will have to buff all the other primaries considerably.