JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

论坛

10/6/2020 2:21:51 PM
4
Yes. But I tend to be an early adopter of technology, and accepted the risk when I did it. Google has a track record of being "flaky", and abandoning projects on a whim. That being said, if you have fast, reliable internet connection, and understand how to set up a network to mininize latency.....Stadia works VERY well. The problems with Stadia are: 1. Many people have poor internet access, or metered/capped access so the streaming doesn't work well for them. 2. Google has ZERO experience at marketing consumer products, and refuses to work with people who do. So the marketing of Stadia is so non-sensical and disorganized its almost laughable. 3. Google has done a terrible job of explaining WHAT Stadia really is, and why its of value. All of these have resulted in a struggling platform, and low player counts for multiplayer games. Which is sad, because the TECHNOLOGY is a breakthrough and works VERY well. This is also the future of gaming. Don't kid yourself. Set up properly, Stadia runs as well as any console being played with a wireless controller. Which is why Microsoft is being VERY quiet about XCloud, and has bundled it into Game Pass rather than trying to sell it seperately. They know that Google has a viable and very compettiive product...and they are largely trying to stay out of the way and let Google self-destruct and then step into the market void they'll leave behind. They are clearly trying to do NOTHING that will provoke Google to get their shit together and turn Stadia around. TLDR: if you're interested in Stadia, I would not pay for Stadia pro right now. I'd use the free-to-try version to see if you like it. If you do pay for Stadia Pro, I would not buy any of the game seperately, but just play the games that come free with the monthly sub fee. Anything else, right now, is not a good value for your money.
English

发贴语言:

 

遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • I honestly doubt that game streaming services are the future of games People still want their own copy Something that they can keep and play for ages

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • [quote]People still want their own copy[/quote] I said the same thing when digitial distribution came to movies....books.....music....and the sale of video games. [b]I've been **wrong** every time. [/b] All of my physical media are gathering dust on shelves and in drawers. The only one that I actually miss in any way are books. There is no substitute for holding a book in one's hands...and in this day-and-age its the best safeguard against being gaslit by those in power. But games will eventually bow to digital distribution. The technology will eventually permit it, and the video game industry isn't fighting. It will come to music (fully) as well. DESPITE the recording industry trying to fight it.

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • Ahhh books I love books Digital books don’t compare to real ones But a download of a game that you can keep on a hard drive for the rest of your life? Im not against digital distribution Im against paying for what i don’t own

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • But that copy on your hard drive is still the illusion of ownership. Especially for online games. Once the developers turn off the servers, there is no playing the game anymore. You're talking about a paradigm that is only viable for single player games that can be played offline.

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

你没有权限查看此内容。
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon