-
[quote]No Smash No Pokemon No FF7 Remake Big trash. Xbox is still the trash platform[/quote] Exclusive to Nintendo platforms. Exclusive to Nintendo platforms and mobile. Made by a declining company. Exclusive to PS for about a year. Agreed. However Microsoft do still have a big hold in the superior device (although their OS has been a bit buggy of late) to go with trashbox.
-
mY pLaStIc BoXeS iS bEtTeR tHaN yOuRs. [spoiler]it's literally the teen aged version of "my dad is better than your dad." No one wins because no one cares and everyone is too stubborn to listen, so just move along.[/spoiler]
-
由Golden_Apple编辑: 7/26/2020 11:06:02 AMMicrosoft has historically priced their box higher aside from the PS3/360 release. If you recall the PS3 being $600 at launch lol PS5 and the Series X have similar specs, but the Series X is gonna have slightly better components as well as proprietary storage so you can't even buy a cheaper third party expansion card to slot unlike the PS5. Ultimately, PlayStation will probably undercut themselves $100. Microsoft won't do it if the Series S is real. Has no Blu-ray disk drive, lower end parts, 1440p res at 30fps, has less Teraflops than the One X and Series X (12TF>6TF>4TF) and I believe it still uses proprietary storage Nvme. So I can easily see the Series S being $250-$300. But since Phil doesn't believe in generations, there's no reason to pick up a Series X at launch if i can play most Xbox new first party games at launch on a older console for 2 years at most. I'm getting a PS5 regardless, but knowing I can play Halo Infinite Day one on the One X/S with Game Pass Ult is almost stealing at this point lol, so might as well get a One X. And most third party devs will be making their games cross gen anyways for the first 1-3 years of a new generation, so I'll be fine. But if the Series S is gonna be super cheap, it'll be standing next to my PS5
-
[quote]Brawlhalla is better than smash[/quote] Community-wise yes. Gameplay, no. There’s a reason why it’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest, competitive fighting game out there. It’s actually the top selling too. [quote]Pokemon is good, but really doesn't make Nintendo better.[/quote] Opinionated statement is opinionated. My initial post is also opinionated. I never meant it objectively [quote]Never played any final fantasy, I will not weigh in here. Xbox and PS lineup is more diverse in my opinion, definitely not trash.[/quote] FF7 is a PS exclusive. My point is that Xbox has the weakest lineup imo. Nintendo>Sony>>>Xbox
-
Ehh I disagree with the first statement, I find brawlhalla to have way better feeling gameplay and a cooler mythos. I don't think bestselling is always the best one. It is opinionated, but I think that most people can agree that a singular game doesnt make one platform better than the others. I just don't really think that I can agree with the statement that Nintendo is better than either Sony or Xbox
-
[quote]brawlhalla to have way better feeling gameplay[/quote] If you’re a casual, sure. But nothing flows like Smash when you’re good at it. [quote]a cooler mythos[/quote] It’s a fighting game. Barely anyone pays attention to that. If they did, Soulcalibur would be considered [b][i]much[/i][/b] better than it currently is due to it easily having the most expansive story and lore of any fighting game series. Buuut it’s always been overshadowed by Tekken due to it being mechanically better.
-
Don’t get me wrong, Brawlhalla is a great game. But mechanically, Smash is superior. All of its clones try to feel like it does, but they come up just short of it. The one that has come the closest so far, at least for me, is Rivals of Aether on Steam. If you put a few hundred serious hours into Smash you’ll see what I mean
-
We aren’t even disagreeing. We’re both correct: Brawlhalla is better casually, Smash competitively. Though Smash can also be really stupid casually through screwing around with the stage builder. But Brawlhalla is great too. You aren’t wrong in your assessment