{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由Yarbey编辑：
11/17/2017 3:50:24 PM
17
Its time we have this conversation despite the controversy
I'm sorry but Alakazam isn't even that good of a Pokemon.
Pyschic as a type has been plagued with uninteresting or just outright cringe inducing designs. Alakazam is no exception to this.
-
1 回复Yep, Incineroar is the best Pokemon. A wrestling tiger with a belt made of fire? He's also a "Heel" type wrestler? Instant favorite.
-
3 回复由One Shot Ted编辑： 11/18/2017 7:15:35 PM
-
7 回复[quote]Pyschic as a type has been plagued with uninteresting or just outright cringe inducing designs. Alakazam is no exception to this.[/quote] What? There are some psychic types, beyond legendaries, that look pretty cool. Gardevoir, for example, has always had a pretty cool design.
-
3 回复Yeah, when I think of my top Pokemon, none of them are Psychic. Never even thought about it until you pointed it out... [spoiler]My favorite Pokemon is Flygon :)[/spoiler]
-
1 回复
-
2 回复
-
1 回复All except for one. THE SOLOSIS FAMILY BABY! HE MAY LOOK LIKE A PAIR OF BUTT CHEEKS IN A BUBBLE BUR HE IS -blam!-ING ADORABLE AND WILL SHRED YOUR ASS ONCE HE BECOMES REUNECLUS
-
2 回复Could never get him because all of the kids at school were not to be trusted Also, lost my link cable...
-
1 回复
-
1 回复
-
4 回复I remember when Psychics were broken as all holy hell because for some reason the only Ghost types, their supposed counter, were part poison and therefore [i]weak[/i] to them. Starmie was a good counter due to being part-psychic, thus being able to tank their attacks. Other than that, anything that could hit hard and fast, and eat a couple of heavy hits was the best bet. To this day, I'm still thoroughly baffled by that design oversight...
-
6 回复
-
3 回复I preferred Kadabra. Also liked to use Hypno. They were OP in the old games. Now it seems fairy types have took that spot from my understanding.
-
2 回复
