Wouldn't that make Liberal Atheists an oxymoron.
Because atheist have no god to work for, why would they support a socialist government where everyone gets equal pay and part of your hard earned money is given to people who don't work. It doesn't benefit them so why are they doing it and they have no god who will judge them based on how well they help others.
See how this statement makes no sense at all, like your post.
God wants us Christians to give to those in need and spread his love. But that doesn't mean it has to be government controlled. We should be giving to the poor out of our own will, not the government. And no we don't hate homosexuals. We don't support homosexuality but we won't hate people who are.
Checkm8
English
-
Just because an atheist doesn't have a god doesn't mean they can do what they want. They just doesn't need a god to have a moral compass and see what is wrong and right. The difference between a christian and an atheist is that a christian does good to go in heaven but an atheist does good just because they know it helps. This doesn't apply for everyone but there are good atheist and bad atheist like their are good Christians and bad Christians.
-
由LiamCDM编辑: 12/27/2016 10:33:08 PMNo my statement makes perfect sense. A liberal atheist like myself bases our progressive views on the same ideas as the Bible, such as love, tolerance, equality and justice, but we support them in a secular manner. Liberals are overwhelmingly more likely to be atheists, while conservatives are overwhelmingly more likely to be religious. This is ironic however, as conservative icons such as Ayn Rand, openly rejected religion and ultimately, God.
-
[quote]Because atheist have no god to work for, why would they support a socialist government where everyone gets equal pay and part of your hard earned money is given to people who don't work.[/quote]I'm not sure you understand what socialism is.