Okay, I realize that the flat earth theory is "intelligent" and "well thought out" but the main problem with the whole argument is the use of circumstantial evidence, man made "proof" and the complete denial of already existing evidence that argues the theory. If the only argument is "earth isn't round because we believe it's not" then you don't have a strong support to grow on. I might believe it if I could see real evidence that supports it but all I see is homemade examples of what the flat earth would be like but I live in a world that accepts real evidence as fact. If I can go outside and experience the supporting proof and you try to explain how yours is real without factuality which am I inclined to believe?