{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由VoS Greed编辑：
8/10/2016 6:34:27 PM
36
-
[quote]Department of justice cares about civil rights. Your comparing oranges to apples.[/quote] FBI statistics make your case irrelevant. The cops were in the right and just doing their jobs unless there's proof on specific cases. Too bad you have no proof.
-
[quote]The DOJ report came out today. Irrelevant? FBI statistics were probably taken into account for this NEW report. You are not making sense.[/quote] It's irrelevant because FBI statistics prove them wrong. The FBI statistics have been recording crime related to race for years and it's been the same for a while. Black are committing more crimes as well as murdering more people. Hence why there are more cops in black neighborhoods. Blacks feel like they're being mistreated because cops are doing their job to keep people safe. Whether it be searching someone because they look suspicious and could have a weapon on them, they do it because it's their job, not because it's "fun to harass people".
-
由STDs101编辑： 8/11/2016 4:12:49 PMGo tell the families of the lost ones both black and cop that bullshit. This situation is real wether you WANNA believe it or not.[spoiler]face it you just don't wanna believe it. You say statistics and proof yet there are hundreds of videos and audio recordings yet still ignore it. You know the truth. Don't have me convinced one bit that you don't by the way you talk[/spoiler]
-
[quote]Go tell the families of the lost ones both black and cop that bullshit. This situation is real wether you WANNA believe it or not.[spoiler]face it you just don't wanna believe it. You say statistics and proof yet there are hundreds of videos and audio recordings yet still ignore it. You know the truth. Don't have me convinced one bit that you don't by the way you talk[/spoiler][/quote] There's so many statistics that back up what the cops are doing. I'll say it one last time: cops are deployed more in black neighborhoods because they commit more crimes ststistically. When confrontations happen, people become unhappy and accusations begin to fly around. Sure there are bad cops out there and they should be punished. But you make it out like all cops are bad. They're not, they just do their job so they can go home safely to see their families.
-
Um. Show me ONE instance when I said all cops were bad. And again, go tell those families about this statistic crap your talking about. Because none of those stats( which I can't even say is true or not cause the internet is full of non resourceful stats) mattered at their funerals. Grow up
-
[quote]Um. Show me ONE instance when I said all cops were bad. And again, go tell those families about this statistic crap your talking about. Because none of those stats( which I can't even say is true or not cause the internet is full of non resourceful stats) mattered at their funerals. Grow up[/quote] Your aggressive tone came off in a way that you were very anti-cop and saw them as bad. I don't mind telling some families that their child was a thug who commited a crime and fought back against the police. They were in the wrong for not only committing a crime, but then retaliating against the police. Also, the facts I used were true because they were recorded by the FBI. And to the families that were wronged by the police in a few instances, they deserve something for their loss.
-
由VoS Greed编辑： 8/10/2016 6:34:45 PMYou're using a blank statement that isn't even backed up by facts. Why was this individual apparently pulled over so many times? Was he going to the same place every time? Was he in the same area every time? You don't just support some blank statement without wondering what happened first. It just goes to show how ignorant you truly are.
-
由VoS Greed编辑： 8/10/2016 6:39:14 PM[quote]Do you understand that was a single example and that the report lists multiple data driven examples that point to the same overall finding?[/quote] How are we expected to trust a news media outlet that doesn't even link their sources? There's no data or sources, just blank statements backed up by nothing. If you want to prove a point, find statistical evidence and link it. CNN is one of the most untrustworthy news stations and just as bad as Fox.
-
This is the result of a year long investigation by the Dept of Justice my man and many other news outlets are reporting it. Excerpts are available everywhere. This isn't about media bias, it's about data. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/10/justice-department-to-release-scathing-report-on-baltimore-police-force.html
-
由VoS Greed编辑： 8/10/2016 7:40:18 PMThe article is just about cops stopping people in areas where there's a high crime rate. The cops are doing their jobs and trying to prevent crimes from happening in these areas that are already bad. Do you know why the cops are "un-proportionally" stopping blacks? Because they commit a majority of crimes in these areas such as robbery, murder, and sexual assault. Blacks only make up 13% of the population yet commit 54% of homicides in the U.S. Is a cop more likely to be deployed or find a criminal in a neighborhood where there is little crime and happens to be less blacks? Or a neighborhood where crime is a lot higher and happens to have more black people living there?
-
[quote]No its not, read the report and stop reciting from your propaganda booklet. It's not just stops, it's brutality, strip searching, due process and so much more.[/quote] I read it and it's about cops doing their jobs. All the article mentioned was searching people and pulling them over, nothing more. When a cop has reasonable suspicion, he can pull over/search someone they deem suspicious. They do this to prevent criminals from committing crimes and most of the time when a cop searches someone they find suspicious, they end up finding something. And to you thinking my facts are propaganda, it's laughable. Those statistics were provided by the FBI so I doubt they're false.
-
Again, you're wrong.. it's not simply about stops. I included a link to the full report. Stop saying you read it.. it's more then that. [b]- Officers "publicly strip-searched a woman following a routine traffic stop for a missing headlight." They even searched the woman's anal cavity. They found nothing.[/b] [b]- A black officer with a reputation for speaking out over misconduct was harassed by a supervisor, who placed signs warning him to “stay in your lane” and “mind your own business” on his desk. [/b] [b]- An officer decided not to report a colleague for planting drugs because he feared retaliation.[/b] [b]- The Justice Department found that officers had been accused more than 60 times of using the word “n****r,” but the Baltimore Police Department didn’t classify the language as a racial slur.[/b]
-
由VoS Greed编辑： 8/10/2016 10:00:10 PM[quote]So according to you reasonable suspicion is being black? Your a great person[/quote] No, reasonable suspicion is when a cop has a reason for someone to be suspicious. Whether it be what they're doing or if they're acting suspicious. If some dumbass is acting like a dumbass and the cop sees that as suspicious, then he can search him. If you actually think cops get a kick out of harassing black people, then you may need to go see a therapist. They're doing their job and following what the statistics show.
