Yeah I didn't even read my entire article. More of a scroll through. As you can see, I don't really care about this topic all that much. Anyway, your BBC article states that 44% were Islamic state attacks. That's nowhere near your ludicrous percentage originally posted. I'm sure this was meant to be a hyperbole, but it doesn't necessarily come across that way on the internet. If you recall, my only claim was that your 90% figure was utterly ridiculous. Which it is. Also, was that article about the whole world or just the 14 countries from that drop down menu? Because you're post was about the entire world.