Do you [i]really[/i] not know what cherry picking is? [quote]([i]of an argument or point[/i]) having a sound basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent.[/quote] (This is your cherry picked definition. [i]Mind you, an opinion is neither an argumentation nor is it a point of argumentation.[/i]) [quote]having legal efficacy or force; especially executed with the proper legal authority and formalities[/quote] [quote]legally or officially acceptable. [/quote] [quote]appropriate to the end in view<every craft has its own [i]valid[/i] methods>[/quote] (These are the other definitions that you've voluntarily left out.) You see how the definition you picked isn't the [i]only definition of the word??[/i] That's because when certain words are used with certain other words around them, they are given this thing called [i]context[/i]. [i]Once again,[/i] validity of an opinion is not based on factuality, but on the subjective interpretation of the one receiving the opinion. [i]That's why[/i] you don't get it. Not because it's wrong, but because [i]you just don't get it[/i]. [spoiler]also, a CEO wouldn't act based on the opinion of a North Korean boy because his opinion is [i]irrelevant[/i], not [i]invalid[/i].[/spoiler]