Random question but are you in college? It relates to what you said lol

It relates to what I said where, exactly...? (•-• )

Answer the question and you'll see

Hmmm.... [spoiler]Yes, I am currently attending college.[/spoiler]

Alrighty then. The reason I asked is that the right way to cite a book/title is italicizing it lol got used to doing it so much haven't ya

Hah, perhaps. XD

Doesn't really bother me too much. As I said in the OP, I see the lack of a campaign mode as a tradeoff Ubisoft made in order to focus on making a very competent and solid multiplayer shooter. Campaign modes in multiplayer-centric titles these days tend to be hastily made, half-assed and scripted, so I'm not really missing it here. The Situations are there to scratch that singleplayer itch, also functioning to prep players for the real meat and bones of the game. I'd love to see a future [i]Rainbow Six[/i] title with a campaign mode focused on tactical squad-based action like the old-school games.

Would you be happy if they managed to fit both in, and make both good? The multiplayer and campaign?

Of course, but they didn't, so all I have to go on is what's there. And what's there is an excellent multiplayer-centric shooter with a heavy emphasis on teamwork, communication, and slow, methodical aiming and movement. Now whether what's there is a good value or worth the $60 is subjective. I think it is, and I don't regret the purchase, but I know some people would feel different. For those people, I'd suggest waiting for a price drop.

For sure.