Alright here are some facts: 1. Hunters were hated in year 1 purely because they had the best subclasses, and still are even now that warlocks and Titans can compete with them. 2. Titans and Warlocks complained about Hunter supers for all of year 1, and were not pegged as "whiners" or "crybabies." 3. Hunters complained about a Titan super for a few months and all of a sudden they are pegged as whiners and crybabies. If you want to talk about bias, why don't you talk about how the Titans and warlocks are so biased against Hunters because they had better year 1 pvp subclasses that they find constant, bullsh[i]i[/i]t excuses to hate hunters. For example, here are some bullshit excuses I've seen on the forums and my explanations as to why they are very obvious bullsh[i]i[/i]t From Titans: Hunters got trials canceled (even though we just had a similar super glitch that [b]we [/b] abused, which we're just going to ignore) From Titans and Warlocks: We hate Hunters because their supers are op (although that's not their fault, and hunters didn't hate Sunbreakers in year 2 and simply acknowledged that it was op) Is that "effective" enough for you? [spoiler]The fact is, I'm right on this one.[/spoiler]

Hunters and Warlocks also hate Titans because they have an OP super, but go further to call everyone who uses it a noob, scrub, idiot, etc. And when it gets nerfed, you complain about how Stormcallers didn't get nerfed, and when you realized that Strikers and Defenders get buffed, you whine about how your supers didn't get buffed.