{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/8/2015 1:09:29 AM
5
Why does everyone compare Sunbreaker to Gunslinger? Golden Gun and Hammer of Sol were not meant to be exactly the same for each class. Sunbreaker has nearly every attribute focused on the super, where as Gunslinger has other subclass talents that are useful, along with an easy to use, fast charging super. If anything, compare Hammer of Sol to Arc Blade.
English
-
Comparing it to Arcblade. Arcblade: Melee only, no range High aim assist (flying vertically to someone) High Mobility Above average armor/protection Blink Great Grenades Lasts decently long ~10-15 seconds Hammer of Sol: High mobility(highest in game/titan skating) Ranged High aim assist Area of effect Highest armor in game(as in, three rockets will barely kill this guy) Decent grenades Lasts ~10 seconds of throwing hammers Lasts ~25 seconds overall And what abilities are you talking about? Sunbreaker has sunspots, and many perks that complement the super. Whereas Bladedancer has blink and more agility, and many perks that complement the super. Every subclass is built around the super, grenades and melee, the only subclass that doesn't have that many perks built around the super is Striker. I [b]don't[/b] want Sunbreaker nerfed into the ground, like auto rifles were. I do, however, want one of their attributes nerfed, whether it be duration of super, range, speed (remove sprinting like Stormcaller), damage, or damage reduction. If any one of those were nerfed, it would still be an OP, easy to use subclass, but it wouldn't be broken as it is now.
