{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由KannibalKlown编辑：
8/25/2015 2:25:49 PM
2
I'm not defending Bungie per-se, but it's not really a lie.
As someone said, things change. We change as well. Our behaviour, our complaints, our actions in games. Bungie has to adjust to keep up. I'm sure when GHorn was designed they didn't think it would become such a crutch and community-divider.
Something said a year ago might no longer be valid or worth-while after a year of interacting with hundreds-of-thousands of people.
My example is obviously hyperbole, but it's like your parents promising you all your life that they'll pay for you to go to Harvard. Cool! But then in your Junior year your parents both lose their jobs, the housing market tanks, the stock market wrecks their 401k, and a parent gets cancer. Suddenly they can't afford Harvard. You're upset for many reasons, but you can't say "they lied" if things changed so greatly.
English
-
由KannibalKlown编辑： 8/25/2015 3:29:01 PMThe fact that people could Ascend just about anything, and reroll Legendary weapons. Combined, it means people just use one of the same handful of weapons and whatever gear they can get max light on the fastest. And Done. Therefore, less diversity. I'm sure when they said "Let's let them ascend purple weapons" they assumed that would increase diversity as people would use some weapon that they like but others hated. I mean there are hundreds of Legendary weapons out there. Instead it became "Instruction Manual - Get Weapon A, Reroll until you get perks X/Y/Z, win" Over and over. Min-Max to roll the best possible weapon. Now most Warlocks look the same, and a large % run with one of the same 4 or 5 legendary primaries
-
How? If Bungie would have made guns that were better and had more variety of guns in the beginning, we wouldnt even be having this discussion. In my eyes Bungie are people and the community is a gun , and we all know a gun doesnt kill the person behind it does.
-
由KannibalKlown编辑： 8/25/2015 3:43:52 PMNot if they do a better job at balancing things out or preventing making the most OP gun That's a [u]BIG *if*[/u] and I'm [u]not[/u] saying they will succeed. But it's possible that they could try to make it so year-2 guns are more balanced out and you can't turn a gun with high-impact/low-stability into a high-impact/high-stability/fully-automatic visage of death. There will always be min/maxers, you can't prevent that. But if you make it TOO easy to min/max then everyone is going to do it because A) it's easy and B) you want to be able to compete against min-maxers Throwing away the old kit COULD be a way to simple say "OK let's start from scratch and prevent them from making the PERFECT-stat guns again"
