Is the 200 Bank Limit on Legendary Marks in TTK to small? Across 3 characters, with 200 Vanguard marks and 200 Crucible marks on each, our bank in year 1 allows for the purchase of up to 6 legendary weapons at any moment without grinding anything additionally. The new bank will limit this to just 1 weapon according to the first Bungie stream in which prices where set at 150 marks. Sure, there is not a weekly cap to legendary marks in year 2 and the bank is shared across characters in the same way as glimmer. Also, you can buy legendary weapons with glimmer once a week from the gunsmith in year 2, assuming you've completed the other various requirements. When answering the poll keep in mind that unlike the old marks, the new marks will be used for more things than the old marks such as weapon upgrades. Do these things, in your opinion, offset the major reduction in the buying power of your maximum bank account size? EDIT: This poll has been up a few days now and it seems [b]0 people have made an argument supporting the bank size limit of 200[/b]. Some players (myself included), obviously, support the idea of unlimited marks earning in the removal of a weekly cap. That said, The question is related to bank size mostly separate from unlimited earning per week. In regards to bank size alone a 200 mark limit is not better than what we have currently. No one has argued that unlimited earning isn't better than our currently limited weekly earning. I encourage players to consider the weekly cap and bank size issues separately. One way to think about it is if they reduced the cost of glimmer items with the most expensive glimmer item set to 1500 would you be OK with a bank glimmer limit of 2000? I think this is a pretty good analogy. I, for one, would not be happy in that scenario. How about you?