It's not fair enough. I'm starting to see a lot of people accepting the fact that how we, the PLAYERS, play the game is wrong, and that Bungie are making changes to get us to play how THEY originally intended. They seem to be keen on the word 'sandbox' at the moment. If by sandbox they mean an open world created for players to explore and play in how they want to then this is not what destiny is becoming. The idea that the Gally nerf is because they did not want one weapon or one strat dictating how people play is ludicrous. They are doing it to cut down on boss burn strats in the same way IB and BH needs will cut down on camping and stagger strats. Both strats developed by players. They nerfed skolas because the only way to beat him was boss burn and stagger. All of these changes are pushing us to use the strategy Bungie want us to use. Do a bit of damage, take out fallen, but more damage, defuse mines, but more damage, fallen, but more damage, pass round poison, fallen, poison, mines, damage, fallen, all wipe, start again. How is that sandbox? To me that is a one strat game. Any strat that leads to taking out skolas prior to the first round of mines is seen as a cheese and not how Bungie want you to play.

I agree that it goes against the whole ethos of a "sandbox" environment. However if the developer wants to channel everybody to play the levels a particular way then there's not much you can do about it other than boycott the game if you are not happy with it. Joining Destiny half way through it's current life cycle, I for one would like a run through Crota's End where there was no "cheesing it" The same goes for Strikes. Although if Bungie released more variety of content then the community may currently be a bit less bored with the repetition & grind.