JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

论坛

由JustOnePepsi编辑: 5/25/2015 11:29:15 AM
1
Compare http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140629135301/destinypedia/images/e/e3/Tamerlane-B.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Improved_M249_Machine_Gun.jpg EDIT: I will concede that the MGs in Destiny are plausible though. Some just don't make as much sense when compared to modern LMGs (which is what they're obviously based on). Also, the Kriss Vector is one of my favorite modern firearms. Mechanically, it's a deceptively simple design though.
English

发贴语言:

 

遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • Yes, I am familiar with the m249. However, you are comparing a weapon that was designed in the 80s, with a weapon that was designed as if it was 100 or 200 years ahead of our current time. In this case I feel I must quote Arthur C. Clarke "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". However I would argue that the weapons in destiny are not all that advanced. Lets look at the image you posted of the Tamerlane shall we. I believe the loading mechanism might not be too dissimilar from what we see in the M2 Browning Machine Gun, where an arm rides up to the feed tray and pulls the round down on the face of the bolt. In fact looking at the Tamerlane - B there seems to be more than enough space in the sloped area just behind the feed tray for just such a mechanism. If it doesn't like like an M249, then chances are it doesn't operate like an M249.

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • :et's also be fair that the reason there's almost a one inch drop on the m2 is because the round itself is one-half inch in diameter.

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

  • A fair point.

    发贴语言:

     

    遵守游戏礼仪。发送贴子前请花点时间阅读我们的行为准则 取消 编辑 创建火力战队 贴子

你没有权限查看此内容。
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon