{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/4/2015 2:25:29 PM
3
How intolerable. You haven't convinced me to think otherwise. Your thinking lacks insight.
English
-
由Britton编辑： 5/4/2015 3:56:23 PMI know I'm also confused as to how you can still cling to your incorrect notions after everything I've told you. Seriously, go research DNA, ecology, and how animals interact with their ecosystems and how ecological niches help shape evolution too. Research the mass extinction events of history, exactly how extensive the fossil record really is, and how the fossils found always correlate with the correct layer anywhere on earth. Go research from actual scientific sources that explain exactly how they arrived at the answers they have. If you spend some time doing that in earnest, and stop sucking up this religious anti scientific propaganda you might actually learn something.
-
由Britton编辑： 5/5/2015 7:00:12 AMFrom what I understand is that it falls back on the laws of thermodynamics and how entropy in a closed system only increases. So it attempts to debunk evolution by that it means because evolution indicates a general increase in life forms on earth, through increased genetic variation, which isn't entropy, it must be impossible. The issue is that earth isn't a closed system so it doesn't have to constantly have increasing entropy. We have a constant influx of energy from the sun, so entropy does not have to increase.
-
That's not genetic entropy or at least, it's not why I meant. I may be using the wrong term but I'm fairly sure I'm not. I agree that arguments is rubbish. Entropy is basically the degrading of DNA over the generations. In humans there are 300 detrimental degradations of the human genome per generation and they are cumulative. They build up and up and eventually there are too many and it leads to extinction. I think the number was something like 80 thousand years before the problems build up to the point of extinction.
-
由Britton编辑： 5/5/2015 1:14:13 PMAh. I see. Well I suppose that will definitely be a problem in humans. We aren't subject to natural selection like animals are. We preserve those "bad" genes through modern medicine, and they get passed on. As for how that would apply in general, I guess 99% of all species to ever exist being extinct should mean something.
-
[quote]Seriously, go research DNA, ecology, and how animals interact with their ecosystems and how ecological niches help shape evolution too.[/quote]I thought you stated to me in a previous reply that environmental hazards doesn't affect the genetics of an organism. Correct?
