I dunno. Interesting stuff for sure. Gets you thinking. But it seems like a lot if circular logic. Of course, the internet is a bad place to learn things. Lol
Haha, Sorry if it seemed circular :) rule no. 1 in philosophy is to have very linear logic.
Let me put it this way,
Anything that is observed exists to the observer >
Something that exists any cannot come from something non-existent >
You know that you exist >
You observe the writing on your screen(the writing exists) >
The writing is a product of something (that also must exist) >
That something (whether it stems from your own mind or is independently existent) exists >
Therefore, I (that something mentioned above) exist.
[spoiler]PS, I meant taking a course in college of some sort or school. Internet courses aren't the same... [/spoiler]
Oh I know. But it all seems pretty circular too me. And bases off of assumptions such as that *a* [i]has[/i] to exist to *b* because *b* creates *a* to make *b* believe in *a* so *a* has to exist.