{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由CyberGama編輯：
5/25/2014 11:24:38 PM
37
Wolfenstein The New Order 1 to 10, what would you rate it?
what would you rate WTNO, IMO it gets a 9/10, a fun shooter that not many are doing now, really sad.
-
0/10 because I'm trying to watch YouTube and for whatever reason, the channel I was trying to watch a play list on had the random 30 second no skip ads of the same wolfenstein commercial. They over advertised it to me. It could be an amazing game but I'll never know.
-
由DELIVER ME MEMES編輯： 5/26/2014 1:45:10 AMvoice controls are somewhat wonky but very neat. you can reload and weapon swap without buttons(which is problematic since the grenade button is weapon swap as well). *glitch-the ar for some reason doesn't voice swap in my game. story can standalone but it's better if you play the prequels Wolfenstein 1993, return to castle Wolfenstien and Wolfenstien(2009). i hate massive amounts of collectibles where the wrong choice in hallway/accidentally progressing means you have to do it all over again. lack of real variety , but lots of throwbacks and a few Easter eggs. 7.5/10
-
2 回覆由TheHouse編輯： 5/25/2014 9:42:42 PM7/10. Pretty good. AI could be wonky at times. For example I'd be stealthy and an enemy would look right at me and go "What the f---?" and then keep walking on. That made it lose a point (even though that weirdly behaved AI worked out in my favor most of the time). The dual-wielding felt unnecessary, I used dual-wielding maybe 5% of the time in combat. For that it loses another point. Finally the last thing that bothered me was that there was a lack of weapon arsenal. There was the AR/Pistol/Shotgun/Beam-Rifle-Thing/and Marksman Rifle. You also had grenades and throwing knives. Thats it, nothing more. Felt very shallow for a single-player only shooter, and for that it loses it's final, and 3rd point. Making it (as stated above) 7/10. The story was good, and contrary to popular opinion, I liked that you had to manually pick up bullets/health/armor. It made combat much more tactical. You couldn't just spam the enemies till they died. The threat of ammunition depletion is something that makes shooters more involved. The combat itself was very straight-forward, it wasn't easy nor hard (I played on the difficulty below Uber), but a good middle. Learning tactics against certain enemy units was something I enjoyed. The game also had a good campaign length, which was good. The graphics were ok for next-gen, but nothing phenomenal. The availability of lore/side missions/alternative game modes/easter eggs/etc. made it a little more fun and is worth noting. Yeah, definitely a good game, but not a great or awesome game by any means. (Keep in mind my 1-10 rating is legit 1-10. 1-4 = bad. 5 = average. 6-10 = good. I also don't do decimals.)
-
7 回覆[quote]what would you rate WTNO, IMO it gets a 9/10, a fun shooter that not many are doing now, really sad.[/quote]-2/10 OUYA FTW!
-
6 回覆
-
14 回覆So far, I'd give it a 9 now that I've played it. I'm only in chapter 4 and this game is pretty long so far. And the doom beta thing is cool too I suppose.
-
3 回覆
-
7 回覆
-
2 回覆8/10, the ending was okay, but they should of ended it differently. Also I would love to see what the multiplayer would look like on the game.
