I completely hear you on those strong outliers at the beginning. It doesn't seem fair because other supers usually have utility at the cost of damage, but those supers have utility [i]and[/i] the highest damage. But regarding the supers that need help, consider this: We are okay with the idea of pvp-focused weapons, endgame-focused archetypes, and so on. In the weapon dept, we accept that certain weapons are only good in certain places. So why are supers exempt from this notion? I don't think every subclass needs to have strong qualities like endgame, dps, and pvp viability between the two supers available. [i]That's why there are options.[/i] If you don't have what you need within a given super, then choose the other super, or choose a different subclass, which gives you 5 other super options. Or, choose a different character, which then gives you 14 other super options. And this is not to mention abilities and identities that change drastically from one subclass to the next. I don't think the "bad super list" has bad supers. They are just being used improperly, or they don't have as many meta qualities. But that doesn't make them bad, it just makes them niche. And don't you think that filling the created niches should be the goal of a build-crafting game? P.S.: With regard to practicality, I don't think supers other than your outlier list are useless because of the meta-ness of those in your list. I think the better way of looking at it is that other supers are still good, but those outliers are stronger than you need to succeed, if not completely overkill. So still use the other supers because they are enough; you don't need to use something meta because "well, it would be stupid not to". The stuff one step behind the meta is a lot better than people realize.