And yet here you are crying about not being able to fight against average players because your bad at the game. I actually play trials and play comp that have SBMM. Meanwhile you cry on these forums because you can’t win while crutching on a vigilance wing.

[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Bad players complain about having to fight people who are only average and call everyone who has above a .9 K/D a sweaty.[/quote] Actually it’s the PvP regulars who complain the most…if they don’t get an easy stomp against blueberries they whine and complain… It’s why sbmm was removed in the first place…[/quote] Nobody wants mercy matches all the time, and nobody wants to play crucible world championship every match either. All we really need lobby balancing[/quote] No we need skill based matchmaking- so that PvP players can actually earn the rewards they get instead of stomping on blueberries to the lighthouse…[/quote] You have a 0.85 K/D. Having SBMM would protect you have screw over everyone else. Especially in QP. Not to mention all the players you want to avoid will just reverse boost into your lobbies anyways[/quote] That’s not how sbmm works if it’s done correctly…I don’t play enough anyways for that kd to count for anything…[/quote] So you don’t play enough but you want SBMM for the people who play often? I don’t I understand why[/quote] Because you should be matched against your peers and so should I. Unless you really can’t compete against players of your skill level - which is usually the case when your stats are padded against newbs and casuals…. Far easier to stomp on blueberries to get to the lighthouse than actually be matched fairly against those of your skill level right? Right?[/quote] You out against people on, above, below, and at your skill level in cbmm. It’s always random regardless. If your bad at the game you shouldn’t get special treatment

That is a better point. But I would add: if it wouldn't be fair for you to fight others [i]at[/i] your level, then it must be even more unfair for another player to always have to fight others [i]above[/i] their level. So why not grant the lower players the minor unfairness you would have by fighting others at their level? That's better than the major unfairness of fighting others above them. Sbmm would elevate the bad players from a state of major unfairness to minor unfairness, and it would lower good players from a mix of fairness and advantage to a minor unfairness. The result would be that everyone has a minor unfairness to deal with, instead of a large schism in the fairness a player experiences. I think that's acceptable because I don't consider fighting someone at your level to be unfair. A tougher fight isn't unfair to me, and I can see why someone would think it is unfair, but I believe it's wrong to entitle yourself to a win. I hope that all makes sense.