JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

服務提示
《天命2》將於明日暫時離線,以進行預計維修。請持續關注@BungieHelp,以獲取更多消息。

論壇

由Unicorn Goo編輯: 10/16/2016 11:27:42 PM
9
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/factchecking-the-second-presidential-debate/ [i]And Clinton claimed Trump’s plan “would end up raising taxes on middle class families.” Some families would see increased taxes, but on average middle-income taxpayers would get a tax cut.[/i] Do you have a link to your claims? Edit: a [i]credible[/i] link
English

文章張貼語言:

 

以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • That has nothing to do with the post. I never said Trump was gonna raise taxes on the middle class.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • [quote]That has nothing to do with the post. I never said Trump was gonna raise taxes on the middle class.[/quote] And Clinton claimed Trump’s plan “would end up raising taxes on middle class families.” Some families would see increased taxes, but [b]on average middle-income taxpayers would get a tax cut[/b] Trickle down economics doesn't give the middle class tax cuts

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • But this plan does massively benefit the wealthy still, whatever cuts the middle class may get is quite overshadowed by what cuts the wealthy get, especially the .1 percent.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • Ok, I ask again for a link from a more reliable source please

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • Here's the analysis from TaxPolicyCenter. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/analysis-donald-trumps-revised-tax-plan/full

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • Thank you. Now, how is this trickle down economics...... [i]His proposal would cut taxes [u]at all income levels,[/u] although the largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households.[/i] I see that it says the largest cuts would go to the top earners, but it also says "tax cuts at all levels" which is not trickle down economics.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • [quote]I see that it says the largest cuts would go to the top earners,[/quote]Well there you go. The theory is that when you give the most advantage to the top earners, they will invest it in their businesses and hire more people or expand their distribution. In reality, that's not what happens.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • [quote]Thank you. Now, how is this trickle down economics...... [i]His proposal would cut taxes [u]at all income levels,[/u] although the largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households.[/i] I see that it says the largest cuts would go to the top earners, but it also says "tax cuts at all levels" which is not trickle down economics.[/quote] Well actually it is, that's what reagan did and that's what theyer speaking of when they say trickle down but trickle down is a buzz word it's supply side

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • Ok, I ask again for a link from a more reliable source please

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

你無權檢閱此內容
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon