Who cares, scenery doesn't mean s*** if there's no playable content. [spoiler]And Bungie has a shit load of unplayable content...[/spoiler] I rather see this game have a steady flow then worry about how it look. Bungie lacks majorly on making a game. Add playable content is majorly needed. Open up the borders on every single planet. There should be a new species by now. There should be at least one new planet. The one vehicle s*** need to go. Make more vehicles. Clan wars. Make more then a 3 man/woman fire team. Would bosses. Stop replacing the old public events with new one in the exact same spots on every single planet. For Christ's sake use your freaking imagination. Open shit up and make the planets worth playing... If Bungie isn't going to make a full game when they come out with new content. Then keep everything relevant. A little expansion is not caused to treat it like a full game. The list goes on. This game needs [b]actual[/b] content. Not mass amount of scenery that does no one any good...

we dont know what exactly their plans for next dlc. lets not jump into conclusions.

The DLC won't because it's still coupled with content that last gens are using. There's literally no engine changes going into the DLC to warrant dropping last gen support. Destiny 2 on the other hand. If it's 30fps then clearly there's a problem.

Frame rate is not a factor of tje game's quality. Remember, when you push for framerate, you compromise some functionality. That is the reason dark souls 3 only runs 30 on console. Even at 30, my game freezes every time I fight the dancer. The main reason 60fps isn't practical in destiny 1's life cycle is programming. Framerate isn't just a graphical tune up like most people believe. Almost everything in the game is run through frames. Your character speed is a function of your position, by frame. Every timer is tracked by frames. In order to change the framerate on a game that's already been programmed, you'd have to rework everything that's part of a sequence, has an animation, or is controlled by a timer, which is just about everything in a game. It's possible for dark souls 3 because platform-delendent framerate was something they had in mind while building the game from the ground up. Even if they managed to make destiny 60fps, there is still the question of functionality. So no, it's not unacceptable, despite what you think. The "this game does it" argument is invalid here.

Destiny 2 should be 1080p @ 60, or else......

Is there a need for sixty frames per second? Would it add to gameplay? We have managed so far with thirty frames per second, so why change something that is not obviously broken?

Very doubtful it'll happen with this DLC. More than likely won't happen until destiny 2