{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由Onxide編輯：
7/29/2015 7:17:39 PM
19
Spartan II's and Spartan IV's?
Which generation of Spartan do you [i]like[/i] better? Personally I like both, they both have their own advantages and weaknesses, but the Spartan IV's win this one for me. I like the II's because they're the classic super-soldiers and they're very well trained. On the other hand I like the IV's just as much do to their more advanced armor and better connection to being human. What about you guys?
Edit: I'm not asking why you think one of them sucks or which one you think is better, I'm asking what do you [i]like[/i] about them. You can like them both, but please don't bother posting anything ignorant.
Keep in mind that these are [u]only[/u] opinions.
-
1 回覆由MassivePenguin-編輯： 8/1/2015 9:54:08 AMThe one thing that people keep bringing up about the Spartan IV's is that they are technologically superior but a spartan II could easily work around an enemy using better equipment. They had been doing that since they were children.
-
3 回覆I find it ironic that the guy who's telling people the difference between fact and opinion is only suppressing other people's opinions If they don't agree with him.
-
1 回覆由The_8_ofspades編輯： 7/29/2015 10:32:16 PMYou forgot the IIIs. Not being sarcastic. I like the twos better followed by 3s and IVs were a joke to me. The IIs had such great characters/people. (Read the books). The 3s had slightly more personality and did just as well, if not better, jobs then the 2s, but with shit for armor, less training, and started running ops at age 12, I think. They had great characters and some epic battles (onyx).The 4s were just a big joke. Basically marines with inexpensive versions of the 2s armor. They had more personality, but one 2 could take down 50 4s. The characters were awful.
-
7 回覆Spartan II had harsher aguementations, training since age of 6. They are weapons. Spartan IV are just soilders who did well in the feild, were given safer aguementations, and newer power armor. Spartan IIs are objectivly better. This isnt an opinion. The sky is blue and the IIs are better than the IVs. [spoiler]my opinion is that I like the IIs more.[/spoiler]
-
1 回覆
-
4 回覆
Tu Chocolate CalienteOnline - 6/11/2024 4:15:13 AM
-
8 回覆
Tu Chocolate Caliente
Online - 6/11/2024 4:15:13 AM
-
2 回覆
-
14 回覆
-
13 回覆The amount of mad the OP is getting here is hilarious. Spartan IIs were kidnapped as children and trained to be the perfect killers and soldiers. They are weapons. Meanwhile IVs are just special soldiers with more training. They are far more expandable than the IIs were. SIIs win in both being more badass and better.
-
19 回覆Spartan IV's are just good soldiers. Spartan II's were built to be weapons. Spartan II's win.
-
1 回覆I am probably the only one in the wold that actually liked the design of spartan IV's But II > IV
-
6 回覆由tmkilla編輯： 7/29/2015 6:19:12 PMspartan ivs suk so hard [spoiler]i say that largely because of ai and partly because they just do[/spoiler]
-
3 回覆
-
7 回覆A single spartan II took 3 halo rings, killed the flood, and saved earth. Which spartans were in ghosts of onyx I can't remember? I II or IV? Because like 300 of them died for a single planet that they failed at, and more of them died to sentinels later on in the next generation, at least the like 4 surviving spartan II's get stuff done.
-
41 回覆
