Yea see I have the advantage of being a chemist and geologist so when I said "an advanced" view of what evolution really is, I meant it. The real answers come from maths, not science actually. It would take more than 2.6 x 10^246 non-lethal mutations, which the vast majority of mutations are lethal(example is cancer). On top of that, half of that that compelling "evidence" you got spoon fed was extrapolated which is the bread and butter of the scientific method. You move your data points to fit the curve you were supposed to get. Science allows itself to use cyclical logic, where the data proves the theory and the theory provides the data. It's a flaw in the method which is controversial in way more than evolutionary debates. It sounds like what I said early was abrasive to you, and that was my intention which was to pick your conscience. Now you have to deal with the reality which is that if you're so sure then why did You get so upset? The cure.for cancer is a triple bonded double cyanide molecule with a configuration where in an acidic environment(extra electrons) the bonds are broken which releases the inert cyanide into actual cyanide whichbthen denies the cancerous cell of oxygen where it then dies. Don't expect to receive this cure if you don't have substantial wealth or fame. You're welcome!