JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

由Tyger Strayfire編輯: 5/27/2015 6:45:22 PM
26

Third Person View Option

YES! A third person view option would awesome!

156

NO! Something like that could ruin the game!

123

Recently I watched some Prison of Elders gameplay and saw the new Fallen relic: the Scorch Cannon. I found it interesting to see a Rocket Launcher like weapon being used in third person since Bungie is known for doing FPS games. So this got me wondering: How would you guys like the idea if Bungie added a third person camera option in the future? Personally, I would love the idea.

文章張貼語言:

 

以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • [quote]Recently I watched some Prison of Elders gameplay and saw the new Fallen relic: the Scorch Cannon. I found it interesting to see a Rocket Launcher like weapon being used in third person since Bungie is known for doing FPS games. So this got me wondering: How would you guys like the idea if Bungie added a third person camera option in the future? Personally, I would love the idea.[/quote] Just give us the on screen option so I can -blam!- up atheon and watch my pretty white armor while he looks back at me and I'm in my chair like *flipping him the double bird with a mean mug*

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • I believe there should be a thirdperson patrol mode seperate from 1st person as well as a Crucible 3rd person gametype. So it would balance the two variations of play.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • I would love a permanent 3rd person option. If people believe an optional 3rd person mode would break or unbalance the game, I am sure 3rd person would come with its disadvantages in pvp. I already carry scorch cannons around in patrol just so I can explore in 3rd person. Only a matter of time before bungie impliments it.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

    1 回覆
    • I would VERY much like to play in third person all the time.

      文章張貼語言:

       

      以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

    • Bump

      文章張貼語言:

       

      以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

    • [b][u]BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump BumpBumpBump [/u][/b]

      文章張貼語言:

       

      以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

      2 回覆
      • So many people cant read....

        文章張貼語言:

         

        以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

      • Perhaps they should deal with all the other issues before dealing with vanity.

        文章張貼語言:

         

        以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

      • 由AssassinN_12編輯: 6/18/2015 11:54:43 AM
        I totaly agree with you and let me make somthing clear since nobody seems to see the word "OPTION" let me repeat the word so more ppl can see it now: [b]"OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION""OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION" "OPTION"[/b] [b]ITS AN OPTION PPL AN OPTION[/b]

        文章張貼語言:

         

        以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

      • Dude, perhaps the best think about destiny is the smoothness of the shooting mechanics. And now you're wanting to take that view away from us just so you can see your glowhoo on your voidfang? Just dumb.

        文章張貼語言:

         

        以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

        5 回覆
        • I'm sorry I've already said this, but I feel it should be reiterated. This is why I don't believe it would be a good idea, even as an option. 3rd person players would have an advantage over 1st person players simply based on screen view-ability. 3rd person has a much wider peripheral vision (obviously) and you can see what's happening behind you without turning around. So there are [b]clear[/b] gameplay advantages when talking about 3rd person gaming. In an online multiplayer game, the way you play the game affects everyone playing with you. Gameplay [b][u]must[/u][/b] be equal and fair. You can like it or hate it; that's just the way it needs to be. So no they would, could, and should not give a third person option.

          文章張貼語言:

           

          以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

          7 回覆
          • UPDATE 1.5: Now that House of Wolves has been released, I intend to test out the capabilities of third person action in Destiny with the scorch cannon. Because of this, I will be testing mostly maneuverability and field of vision. Please, stay tuned. :)

            文章張貼語言:

             

            以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

          • [b]It would be amazing. Bungie will never put it in the game.[/b]

            文章張貼語言:

             

            以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

          • It's wierd they don't have the option..The coding is already there. When u use the sword or relic is 3rd person.

            文章張貼語言:

             

            以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

          • People saying this would be a huge advantage over people using fist person view seem to forget MW2 did this and nobody complained. Why? Because they restricted it to certain game types and everybody played in 3rd person. You guys never think really hard on how this will be implemented. You think if this feature is added, it will be some sort of toggle inside a PvP match.

            文章張貼語言:

             

            以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

          • Pick up the sword or relic there's your third person.

            文章張貼語言:

             

            以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

            2 回覆
            • Bump. If you make different modes for pvp so it wont get mixed together

              文章張貼語言:

               

              以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

            • 由Yoguh編輯: 5/11/2015 4:25:43 AM
              Third person view sucks sometimes.. I always get confused when I pick up relic in Atheon stage.. Feels dizzying to me..

              文章張貼語言:

               

              以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

            • 由Juliet Stormcrow編輯: 5/11/2015 3:10:23 AM
              I wanted a Third Person View [b]option [/b]from the start!!! [b][u] ONE OF THE BEST IDEA I'VE EVER HEARD SO FAR!!!![/u][/b] -Until Next Time, Guardian! <3 Edit: Bungie better listen to you!

              文章張貼語言:

               

              以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

              1 回覆
              • NOOOOOOOOOOO! I Love first person! Destiny is best RPG MMO FPS!

                文章張貼語言:

                 

                以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                4 回覆
                • Nah man. It wouldn't be worth the time or effort in my opinion. Look at Fallout 3 for instance, it had both views available and yet I never used third person.

                  文章張貼語言:

                   

                  以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                • This would be awesome

                  文章張貼語言:

                   

                  以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                • I feel like Destiny should've been a third person game from the start.

                  文章張貼語言:

                   

                  以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                • Part of a FPS is not being able to see what's behind you. Third person view would change the game completely. If you've tried playing GTA 5 in first person after playing for months in 3rd person, then you know what I'm talking about. First person GTA is harder in almost every way.

                  文章張貼語言:

                   

                  以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                  6 回覆
                  • It looks weird. 3rd person shoots like Gears of War have advanced strafing abilities. This game has nothing.

                    文章張貼語言:

                     

                    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                    1 回覆
                    • As long as you can't use it in pvp.....try to keep that from being any less equal. Enough hate from that side of the game as it is.

                      文章張貼語言:

                       

                      以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

                    你無權檢閱此內容
                    ;
                    preload icon
                    preload icon
                    preload icon