JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

論壇

2/28/2015 9:16:44 PM
1
I'm fine with nerfing range, nerfing damage/impact is not right.
English

文章張貼語言:

 

以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • 由xDeFalt編輯: 2/28/2015 9:24:59 PM
    It's 2% dude lol, think about this real quick,I'm gonna math this out for you. If you do 100 dmg on body shots pre patch,how much will you do post patch? 98 dmg,now Idk about you, but I in no way see that being a problem anywhere in the game, even crucible,if ars were 3 shot kills and this nerf made them 4 shot kills, sure, but that isn't the case, so why exactly is a 2% dmg reduction bothering you

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • play with couple of AR's before talking with numbers. People get melted with pulse via red death and bad juju vs an AR user. Plus with the low impact god id rather click away bullets rather than auto fire plastic bullets

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • its 2% for the weakest impact AR's. SUROS, got cut by like 14 %. Guns like Hard Light and Monte Carlo were also hit harder than 2% and they were already pea shooters. Now you're firing marshmallows. Guns that already had bad range had range and impact cut. Hardlight was already a mediocre gun, now its unusable.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • This isn't true, that 2.5% "nerf" is actually deceiving. It may be 2.5% to low impact/high rate of fire auto rifles. However, high impact and slow rate of fire auto rifles such as Suros, received about a 14% damage nerf.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

  • No it isn't 2 percent, look at the thread listed on here.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

你無權檢閱此內容
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon