The only reason people hate on it is because it doesn't have firefly. Really? Everyone praises the fang of ir yut, yet it has absolutely nothing special. It's barely better than NITC. WoC is a beast in PvP and it's awesome to use too in PvE. If fatebringer never existed, WoC would be ''The Gun'' to get. This community has been spoiled. What's completely retarded is the love for the fang over WoC, lol. Why would you use a scout rifle over a decent hand cannon? (especially WoC with the (potential) 16 bullets) Takes double the effort to do as much dmg AND is awkward to use at close range.
-
I like WoC. It's a solid HC. I have a feeling that a couple of these new raid primaries are going to go through some changes. Bungie will most likely, slightly buff a few things and possibly even switch some perks out for something that better suites these guns. All of that will of course come 4 months from now after they have fixed cheeses that we players haven't even discovered and exploited yet.
-
5 回复WoC is a nice change (performance and look) from Fatebringer. I don't mind not having firefly or outlaw; but who the fk needs god damn void damage...
-
5 回复Enemies with void shields: Vex Minotaur Vex praetorian Cabal psion Two of the three don't have critical spots. So the elemental damage is of limited use due to the limited amount of enemies with this elemental shield and the perks are of limited use as well. You are better off using a normal legendary HC with more impact because it will kill quicker due to its higher impact on the non shielded enemies which are more frequent. Then switching to a elemental for the shields.
-
2 回复I'm disappointed with woc its special perk just ain't that special I will continue to use fb
-
1 回复I much prefer Thorn and Timur's Lashes (have 2). WoC is a poor man's TLW with inappropriate perks and no cool animation. My WoC is fully levelled and sits in my vault.
-
10 回复
-
It's perk set isn't better than Fatebringer but it's still a very useful gun to have. Next time Void burn is up I'll feel sorry for the guys still using the Epilogue. But yeah aside form the Void damage it's a good hand cannon, not a great one.
-
1 回复think lash is better it rolls to suit players needs, only gun that out does it in damage is hawkmoon and with field scout has 13 rounds
-
7 回复No. It's bad compared to fatebringer. It does a whole 10 more dmg and has perks that don't work l.
-
My problem is just the stats. To me a high rate of fire is useless especially since I have to get crits in order to activate the perk, furthermore the impact is really low for a hand cannon. It all depends on play style really.
-
4 回复I don't have word of crota but its perks are nothing compared to fatebringers. Just a question but do you have fatebringer?
-
I find that the word of crota isn't really that special, especially in pvp. When I fire it fast I get confused on where the sight is. The hive plates on the sides make it distracting. Fatebringer is better because of the precision reload.
-
2 回复I don't like it cus it has void, I have one and I don't think I'll use it, everything is pretty much solar or arc, it's only gonna be real useful in void nightfall a, but even then there's arc enemies. Disclaimer: it's obviously useful if you're a hand cannon kind of guy, but I am not.
-
3 回复You are mistaken. It's not just because it doesn't have Firefly that people hate on it. WoC impact low for a HC (many adds that FB kills in one crit shot require 2 from WoC) and it's broken. Hive disruptor negates crit shot perk, as do explosive rounds which makes it dumb to include them as an option. Void damage means it will be most useful against Vex. Minotaurs have no crits, again negating the perk. It's really a poorly designed weapon on Bungie's part. Imho, the two best 331 HCs are Timur's Lash and Thorn. I am on Xbone, so can't speak for the Hawkmoon. Fatebringer is still the next best HC after those. Better for some circumstances, such as Arc NFs and even this week's triple burn NF.