{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/30/2014 10:47:17 PM
3
Plasmas have lower refresh rate(which is responsible for input lag), worse contrast ratio, lower pixel motion and color transition rates, lower sharpness. There is a reason why plasmas are being phased out and have always been trash for gaming.
Anyone who buys a new plasma might as well shouldn't be buying a TV period.
English
-
My Samsung plasma has plenty of contrast & sharpness.... And... Real, rich blacks. And it's 58" Look, I am a ex-pc gamer. I don't notice any input lag compared to my monitor days.. I have no desire to upgrade my pc every year, I've become a casual gamer in my age & responsibilities in life this why I enjoy consoles more now. Put the game in and play.. No money pit changing out graphics cards, updating drivers...
-
derp... derp... derp... Plasma refresh rate is 600Hz. Samsung PN60F8500 conrtrast ratio is 55,779:1 Plasma is being phased out due to sales figures. Not for any of the things you just made up. Go to ANY TV review site and ALL will ind plasma better then LED. derp... derp... derp... Kid... you are trying to sound smart, when its clear you are a total BS'er. QUit while you are behind.
-
"better" is a matter of preference. I prefer deep inky blacks and contrast to color pop and brightness. Motion has a more natural smoothness than the 120 and 240 emulation.LED based TV can't touch this models picture quality. Input lag could be better, but its good enough for what I do. Until OLED's come down, this is one of the best IMO.
-
I play on a 60" Panasonic plasma and it's pretty ridiculous Beaver. You'll get better brightness on LED/LCD but the colors and depth of a plasma is pretty damn good. However, a smaller unit, like a gaming monitor will have better contrast given that the pixels are a lot closer together.
