Life exists here, therefor its a safe assumption that it exists elsewhere. If there were omnipotent beings here, I would assume they are elsewhere. There aren't, therefor there aren't elsewhere as well.

..

Then how do you explain split jaws?!

yor stoopid

LIAR! HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN ME? OR VIEN?

I think I know where you're going with this thread. Here's why it's fallacious. The possibility of extraterrestrial life is helped along by that fact that we know of possible mechanisms by which it could have arisen(those being the same or roughly the same as the ones by which life on Earth may have arisen). http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis (go to current model) Then there's our knowledge of stellar evolution and planetary formation which suggests, along with the sheer ridiculous number of exo planets we've found, that planets outnumber the stars in our Universe. Due to the huge numbers involved, planets with favorable conditions for life as we know it are a statistical inevitability(let's not forget the possibility of life not as we know it). If chemistry acts the same across our universe(as the Copernican principle says it should) then extraterrestrial life is rendered statistically likely. Far from a faith based claim.

Somewhat relevant.

Bait ! *casts line into thread* Who said that God isn't an alien?

Then why are you here

I'll have you know I have been anally probed multiple times by aliens. But it's kind of strange, i'm always taken to the same sleezy motel room after being given a drink and they always look like homeless guys... Joking, obviously. I'm too paranoid to be drugged without knowing it. :P

Read a question on reddit last week that got me thinking.. What if the planets we're seeing from within our universe actually have fully functioning populations today, but because of the distance, we're seeing that planet millions of years before that population began?

See kids, this is not how you do trolling.

Lies!

no u

A 6 year account and this is the best you can come up with?