Rogue is a correct word? Damn, I thought it was rouge since the person becomes blood-addled upon leaving or a renegade which resembles the red from the word.

Rouge is a deep shade of red it does not mean "red" How can you not know this?!?! That is like saying pink is another name for red how can you be this stupid!!

rouge1 ro͞oZH/ noun 1. a red powder or cream used as a cosmetic for coloring the cheeks or lips. verb 1. color with rouge. "her brightly rouged cheeks" Francais: Rouge English: Red Congratulations, you're a moron.

Nobody cares dude seriously get off your computer chair and do something my iPhone is annoying I don't care about spelling you're gay AF and lonely.

Am I? Or is the moron the one complaining about a commonly miss spelled word on a forum? Only to be trolled into taking time out of his life to Google the word rouge just to copy and paste on the same thread? Do I see a tint of rouge on those cheeks?

Sir, if I am a moron for wasting my time without knowing it, what does that make you, a person whom wastes his time willingly, yet doesn't understand the hypocrisy of his actions? You certainly have my pity, if nothing else, though I am certain you're merely attempting to use the commonplace cop out of "I was trolling you" in an attempt to fabricate a veneer to cover up your own fatuousness. Verily you would not attempt this if the altercation was swaying more auspiciously in your own favour, and this rends this newly fabricated illusion void. Though I must commend you on your ability to unknowingly vouchsafe a superfluous amount of your time trying to peruse this most verbose of replies, pertaining to merely demonstrating the dramatized persona of a sciolist. It seems that I have far more audacity than I had even expected, thusly and easily exceeding your expectations through the utilization of fervent and ardent words to solicit your attention, for whatever it may be worth. Though your misgivings about my own vexation stands as a pivotal point from which I can retract and put forth a great deal of ambiguous and vague words, strung together in a coherent, yet irrelevant fashion. I appreciate your lacklustre attempts, and your solicitousness in regards to my state of being, but to be blunt, you seem a rather vacuous and vapid individual, verily this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so permit me then, in lieu to the more commonly used insult, to thank you for the time you've so willingly spent, and that it was my deepest honour to call you an idiot.

TL;TR, If you need me to explain the quote let me know :) [quote]I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.(Mark Twain) [/quote]

Oh, so you decide against reading it. Such a shame. Then again, it probably was beyond you.

I'm a snob for correct paragraph structuring and that was a mess. Plus if you wish to insult someone keep it simple. That long over thought out thesaurus vomit made you look pathetic. I pity you. Try again

So basically you weren't capable of reading it and instead tried to save face by saying it was because of there being no "proper" paragraphs? Truly, you didn't understand any of it if you thought it was entirely an insult.

You don't seem to be able to read properly... Reread my last reply and you will find a little surprise. If you can't find it I will have to abandon this fun exchange. No one likes to see a adult pick on a little kid...

Things I know about you: -You're grasping for straws -You're unoriginal -You have little reading comprehension -You're trying to transfer from one subject to another -You're terrible at the former -You have the worst excuses that I've ever seen -Apparently you're a snob for paragraphs -The most intricate word you know is exchange -You like to supersede yourself in the position of the adult, when you're definitely the child -Your conversations have become less amusing -You have a strange fetish for vomit -You probably haven't read to this part -Your next reply will be no more intelligent than the last -You most likely can't read Latin -Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur -You can't say 'm' without touching your lips -I've nearly run out of things to say about you -You may have figured it out yet -Though I'm not entirely certain -If you multiply any number between 1 and 10, by nine, then subtract five, both digits added will make 4 -You've probably gotten it by now

[Things I know about you: -You're grasping for straws (not true I just like to see you waste time) -You're unoriginal (I am very original, there is no one like me :). ) -You have little reading comprehension ( My minor is in literature, I have read more books than you know book titles.) -You're trying to transfer from one subject to another ( not really, there is no subject to this discussion unless you count your pompous attitude) -You're terrible at the former ( Can't be terrible If the subject does not exist) -You have the worst excuses that I've ever seen ( Excuses? Hmmm not sure I gave any) -Apparently you're a snob for paragraphs(That I am) -The most intricate word you know is exchange ( that word isn't as intricate as you believe.) -You like to supersede yourself in the position of the adult, when you're definitely the child ( I an a child at heart but adult hood has grasped me and will not let go) -Your conversations have become less amusing ( but you have not) -You have a strange fetish for vomit (oh so close) -You probably haven't read to this part ( false) -Your next reply will be no more intelligent than the last ( not very Intelligent but witty) -You most likely can't read Latin(This is true but I can read Spanish, Greek, and English) -Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur( Guess I can read Latin if I know Spanish) -You can't say 'm' without touching your lips( true) -I've nearly run out of things to say about you (Remember that Quote?) -You may have figured it out yet (Random thought?) -Though I'm not entirely certain ( You clearly are not) -If you multiply any number between 1 and 10, by nine, then subtract five, both digits added will make 4 (Interesting but not about me) -You've probably gotten it by now (42) That was fun But you failed..... I'm sorry. The surprise was I did read that monster of a reply but it was more fun to watch you try and prove you are the smartest person here. You may continue now.

You do know how to quote right? Cause you're inability to do so is the most adorable thing I've seen on these forums.

Ohhh your lack of reading is so cute.... Or you are just trying to get away from that wonderful list you provided and my even amazing answers. Either way I will give you another chance to respond. Go ahead now

Sir, you are the most arrogant, insipid, inane, ludicrous, vacuous and vapid individual I have ever met. You've already lost a myriad of times, yet still believe even after your last incredible blunder, that you can save face. This rends everything you said moot, as it proved just how asinine and pathetic you truly are. This is a battle of wit, to which you've come to unarmed. Now flee, you pathetic mewling quim. I no longer wish to trade words with such a witless worm.

I couldn't be bothered reading all of that wow you sir have no -blam!-ing life LMFAO

You couldn't be bothered reading. Yes, I know that two minutes out of your pathetic ludicrous life is too much for you to spare. Though I believe the actual reason behind it is that you are illiterate, and as such could not even look at it without instigating a headache, let alone attempt to peruse it.

I don't know why your name is Caboose because you're a genius. Not because of the big words, but because you're slicing all the people up in here. Somebody give this man a reward.