{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/6/2015 2:26:59 PM
37
-
When you're supposed to be a news source, yes. If you present something, then people become aware of it, whether you bash it or not. The viewers may do independent research and form their own opinion on it. If it's never presented at all, then the viewers never become aware of an issue at all.
-
It can be disguised and twisted, but it's still there. I never said that bashing it isn't bad, but an absolute refusal to show it at all is worse. It's like aggressive vs. passive aggressive people. Both are bad. But passive aggressive people can be more difficult to deal with.
-
They choose what to air. Just like other stations choose to air something just for the sake of degrading it. Both are equally bad, no worse then the other. Trying to pick the lesser of the two evils is impossible, because they're the same.
-
It is a little more in depth than you are saying. The issues I speak of are the types of people president Obama is friends with. Namely William ahers, Reverend jeremiah wright, ect ect. No on on CNN or MSNBC reported these links to his character. Many have no idea the type of person obama is. He is completely anti-America. He believes we need to give up our freedoms to make up for the "bad" we did.
