-
You probably get a little kick out of trying to entice people into shit like this because you read something somewhere on Wikipedia and you think it makes you a -blam!-ing psychologist or philosopher or some shit. Well the -blam!-ing truth is you cant prove shit. You can always say well prove that fact is a fact. The "fact" is you cant. Its just our perception of truth. Go -blam!-ing read some more Wikipedia asswhipe.
-
由A84编辑: 2/11/2015 5:40:52 AMGod...it's like...it's like you only read my OP and not my responses, and then based my entire thought process off of an action, without taking into consideration [i]reaction[/i] reveals thought patterns and processes better than [i]actions[/i] do. Didn't read shit off Wiki. Your claims are baseless. Yes, I did this for fun and "kicks". No need to be a one inch dick about it.
-
由a hobbit编辑: 2/11/2015 5:47:11 AMSays the guy that said [quote]not even close try again[/quote] To an obviously stupid response to a stupid question as if to just put yourself above me. And then completely ignore the main point of the message other than the "fact" that you are a fruit and that you can always argue a point. [spoiler]but you wont even address this cause you know there is no -blam!-ing point the kind of psychological bs you are talking about is 100% unprovable therefore 100% irrelevantgo back to your life if you have one[/spoiler]
-
Top five ways to wave off people who outsmart you 1. Call them ignorant 2. call them stupid 3. Say goodbye as if you somehow had the power to end the conversation 4. Not respond because you will look like more of a fool 5. Hail satan
-
1 never happened. 2 never happened. I have the power. I have the power because it takes two to hold a conversion, and thus I ended it. I ended it because there's no point in arguing with you. You would end up looking he fool because all you could do was dig up some basic, pre-pubescent insults.