{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由BladeSpyker編輯：
1/15/2015 9:54:00 PM
53
For those that think they OWN the game . . .
You don't.
Read Carefully: [url]http://www.bungie.net/en/View/bungie/eula[/url]
You are LICENSING the rights to play Destiny.
Any content that may have been on the Disc at time of purchase is not yours it belongs to Bungie and Activision.
Therefore you were never cheated out of any content as it was not yours.
If this is unacceptable to you there was a 30 day refund policy granted to you in the terms & conditions that you probably didn't read. If it has been more than 30 days you have no one to blame but yourself.
-
Bungie stated back during the open beta that the content for the first (FIRST DLC was going to be released on the retail disc to make it easier for customers of the game whom had CRAP internet connections to be able to download the patches and play the DLC faster. if people would pay attention and stay informed, they wouldnt be immature crybabies now.
-
3 回覆"But we bought DLC but it was already on disk! Wine wine wine" Do you even know what dlc means? "DownLoadable Content." Nope. Disk Locked Content.
-
11 回覆由Xyrin Arcaiin編輯： 1/16/2015 2:41:26 AMWe own the game. The content may be Bungie's idea but it wad distributed to people as a product for play, now they maintian that product and improve it with hot-fixes and DLC's. Therefore, we own the game. (This probably makes no sense but my point is, we own the game and this post is pointless.)
-
For a year, they showed us a game that they told us was Destiny. The game they released was factually, substantially different from what they had previously shown. Yes, there was, no doubt, a disclaimer that said "subject to change." However, do you suppose Activision knew that the things they showed pre-release would influence sales? Do you think they knew that the things they cut from the game after showing them as content would matter to consumers? In your opinion, do you think that a company which makes use of disclaimers and "fine print" to legally, if not ethically, substantially lessen release content versus pre-release demos and previews is deserving of your future spending?
-
4 回覆
-
7 回覆
-
2 回覆We don't own anything The government does ..... Obama is a lizard and the government is reptiles
-
*epic facepalm* Every single game company is doing this, and they have been for a long time. Why? It's obvious, you buy a copy of the game to play it, therefore what you actually buy are the rights to play that game. Of course you do NOT own the game, nor any of the disc contents, all you own are the rights to play it...and it doesn't make a difference for a gamer...at all.
-
3 回覆So, Internet lawyer, describe the difference between "owning" the right to play something and "licensing" the right to play something. Do you own the physical disc, or are the video game police going to storm in and raid your house for it?
-
3 回覆由GigabyteZ3r0編輯： 1/16/2015 4:24:41 AMOld news bro, everything is like that. You license your operating system, (or stole it), ms office, iTunes, every application and software on your computer, tablet, phone, car ... Etc. Pretty much any software is done using a license. Hell even open source software is published using a license.
-
Yeah they're saying that the content is being licensed to us like we are legally able to access it. Because this content is copyrighted and they dun' wan' none o' dat theft business they let you enjoy what they have made but you just can't say you OWN what they have made. You own the right to play it not the right to it. :D
-
4 回覆Yeah haha this post doesn't even matter 😂 as long as I'll ever want to play this game it will be available to me haha as long as I can sell it to a friend or trade it then I OWN it lol
