原先發佈於:PC Gaming Master Race
If you're looking for something UNDER $300 dollars, your best bet for an upgrade is the GTX 660.
[b]Price:[/b] $226.49 from Amazon
[b]Power:[/b] Not much more than your SLI system, but still a bit of an upgrade
If you're going big, the GTX 680 is the current biggest bang for your buck. (690 isn't worth the pricetag and I don't even KNOW what TITAN is yet, cept it's got 6gigs of Video RAM. DAMN)
English
-
To add to the GTX 660 pro's, I was able to get an MSI TwinFrozr III OC'd model for just under $200 at Microcenter. I've only seen it get to about 50 C when gaming, and that's after a while. The only con I think worth mentioning is the coil noise, which can be quite annoying at times but if you have a good case it shouldn't bother you too much.
-
Well, looking at that chart I provided in my original post, a GTX 680 gets you 1536 cuda cores and 2gigs of graphics RAM for roughly $450-480. (Takes roughly 180W of power) SLIing 660s gets you 2 x 960 cuda cores (1920) and 2gigs of graphics RAM for the price of 2 x $229 ($458). (Wattage of 149W x 2. 300W about) So yes, you'd honestly get more power from SLIing 2 660s, but it'd comsume more power from your power supply. (You didn't mention what yours was)
-
Titan is essentially NVidia's answer to the 6GB AMD cards. I'd love to get one just to say "look at me, I'm lacking in the pants department so make up for it with the most expensive and powerful single-core card in the world." The GTX 680 is the top NVidia card at the moment when not factoring the 690 or Titan as you say, but with a hefty price tag it can be better to get the AMD cards and get a better bang for your buck.
-
That's true. AMD can give you more bang for your buck. I personally prefer Nvidia because I've had issues with AMD cards failing within the year I bought them AND having to deal with poor customer service. That said, I've never had to deal with Nvidia customer service cause all my cards are still working.