{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由Dildact編輯：
1/31/2013 12:06:09 AM
18
The Dildact say EA is a horrible company.
The Dildact says BF:BC2 ended on a major cliffhanger yet EA choose to make generic military shooters like BF3, MOH, MOH:WF and are starting BF4.
The Dildact asks why?
The Dildact says MOH is just a stripped down Battlefield, and Battlefield is just a generic Battlefield: Bad Company.
The Dildact actually cared for characters in BF:BC2 instead of generic Navy Seals in MOH and generic Battlefield.
-
1 回覆Quit talking in third person. It's not cute, it's not funny, it's just annoying as hell.
-
7 回覆
-
Why are you [i]still[/i] talking in 3rd person? All it does is piss people off. Nobody likes you. The thing is though, you aren't a troll, judging by your posts. So why do you do this? For individuality or something? Its incredibly annoying and takes away all of your validity by doing it. Seriously dude, just stop...
-
1 回覆
-
4 回覆If you really want a horrible company look at Valve. They make EA look like a godsend.
-
Bad Company Two was a badass game.' The Vietnam Expansion Pack was the best thing I've ever played. I want more of THAT. Something like that for the Arcade, similar to Battlefield 1943, because the Vietnam expansion was balanced, fun, and badass. Did I mention that it was badass?
-
Lucky is disappointed at how EA grew as a company, he thinks that a company should respect its customers instead of throwing dirt at them at every given chance, after all Lucky thinks that customers are those that work day or night to purchase the said goods and they deserve some respect.
-
2 回覆
-
1 回覆
-
1 回覆I really would love to see EA burn for its crimes, then all the devs it previously murdered be revived by better publishers that aren't completely driven by greed. Too bad it'll never happen.
