{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/30/2013 6:24:14 PM
52
Should Titanfall be sold for a reduced price?
If Titanfall is a multiplayer-only game shouldn't it be sold for $40? Or some sort of reduced price? I think this makes more sense than a $60 price tag, but it's EA, so they'll probably price it at $60.
English
#Gaming
-
Half the price! My dumb ass bought the collectors edition
-
7 отв.Bungie.net in the past: God, Halo 3: ODST is such a rip off, it should be cheaper, not full price! Bungie.net now: LOL, TitanFall being at a reduced price? What a Sony fanboy! Such a total dipshit!
-
No let it go.
-
1 ответOP really rustled you guys.
-
Should Halo be sold at a higher price because it also has custom games, Forge and theater? Because of those things I think the game should be sold at around $120.
-
4 отв.Oh look, another self entitled bitch thread created by the poor.
-
8 отв.Isn't destiny a multiplayer only game? Should it be at a reduced price too? And TES? And The Division?
-
Well video games with only stories are sold for 60$ too =/
-
Any game should be sold at a reduced price.
-
Not sure why MP only makes it half a game.
-
3 отв.Nowhere in history does it say that a game has to include SP and MP in order to charge 60 dollars. How about the games that are SP only? Those are still 60.
-
2 отв.well i kind of agree that it should be half price but it depends on what the final game looks like when its done.
-
I think PC and digital games should be cheaper than physical copies of the game.
-
2 отв.Fanboy wars in yet another thread. Remember the VGX guys. Remember the horror that awaits all of gaming if we do not unite.
-
1 ответI think all games should cost $50.
-
8 отв.Изменено (Im Panther Land): 12/31/2013 3:50:37 PMyou cant even play it so why do you care? Oh look, lilpeacedude(aka -blam!-) Bungies #1 rated $ony Fagboy The honor is mine
-
35 отв.Why? I wish every game was multiplayer only. This way the devs can focus on what truly matters, competitive multiplayer.
-
-
1 ответИзменено (StiviX): 12/31/2013 12:54:54 AM[quote]...but it's EA, so they'll probably price it at $60.[/quote] What does EA have to do with anything? No publisher would sell a game receiving this much attention from the mainstream gaming media outlets AND being made by the minds behind the success of CoD for less than standard pricing.
-
Normally yes, but it's EA and Respawn Entertainment (the former Call of Duty guys) so they kind of get to bend the rules and get away with it.
-
It has a story that can only be played in multiplayer.
-
Not as long as the multiplayer makes up in greatness, detail, and other stuffz.
-
Being an EA published title, I will avoid it. I have a 360 and a PS4 and plan on a XBoxOne but I avoid anything published by EA Will it help who knows. Titanfall looks like one hell of a game but I will be missing out on it.
-
4 отв.That's retarded
-
Doesn't work that way. Games such as Fallout and Skyrim don't have multiplayer but have great campaigns. You can only do that if it goes both ways. Which it doesn't
-
That only works with MMOs, you get it cheaper to start with so you're more willing to pay the subscription later on. I got Final Fantasy XIV: ARR, for 20$ at first, once my trial expires, I'm not sure if I'm going to sign up for more for 14.95$ or whatever the price is.
