{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/24/2019 7:00:34 PM
13
No hobbit tho. Those movies trash and butchered the best book ever written
English
-
-
[quote]No hobbit tho. Those movies trash and butchered the best book ever written[/quote] They actually did alright. Sure, too much CGI and the lame she-elf arc could have been excluded, but Peter Jackson had to rush and settle for mediocrity because the initial director quit
-
Trash movie is trash
-
[quote]Trash movie is trash[/quote] False. It was better than Endgame by far.
-
-
[quote]Nah fam[/quote] No. Endgame was underwhelming. I’m glad I didn’t pay to watch it.
-
[quote]Nah fam[/quote] Endgame dragged and was pretty boring and uneventful. Probably one of marvel’s worse movies.
-
They butchered them soooo hard. It's probably the single worst book to movie adaptation. I actually still watch them because it's quality fantasy, but I can't view it as anything better than hobbit fan fiction
-
[quote]They butchered them soooo hard. It's probably the single worst book to movie adaptation. I actually still watch them because it's quality fantasy, but I can't view it as anything better than hobbit fan fiction[/quote] It could have been better, but it wasn’t butchered. It wasn’t near the quality of the LotR series, sure. However, the Hobbit wasn’t supposed to have the same tone as the LotR series in the first place.
-
[quote][quote]They butchered them soooo hard. It's probably the single worst book to movie adaptation. I actually still watch them because it's quality fantasy, but I can't view it as anything better than hobbit fan fiction[/quote] It could have been better, but it wasn’t butchered. It wasn’t near the quality of the LotR series, sure. However, the Hobbit wasn’t supposed to have the same tone as the LotR series in the first place.[/quote] The tone was fine, but the tone was actually darker then the LotR series. But as far as Lore goes, they did butcher it. The fact they made three movies out of it alone was sacrilege
-
[quote][quote][quote]They butchered them soooo hard. It's probably the single worst book to movie adaptation. I actually still watch them because it's quality fantasy, but I can't view it as anything better than hobbit fan fiction[/quote] It could have been better, but it wasn’t butchered. It wasn’t near the quality of the LotR series, sure. However, the Hobbit wasn’t supposed to have the same tone as the LotR series in the first place.[/quote] The tone was fine, but the tone was actually darker then the LotR series. But as far as Lore goes, they did butcher it. The fact they made three movies out of it alone was sacrilege[/quote] With better editing they could have narrowed it down to 2 movies. Their goals were to add more character development and to fit within the 3 movie trend. Similarly, there were aspects of the Lord of the Rings movies that weren’t at all in the books... “butchered” and changed to make a more compelling cinematic narrative you may say if you’re willing to be consistent.
-
[quote]worst book to movie adaptation [/quote] *laughs in so many different movies* [spoiler]sorry but I have seen worse[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]This frightens me...[/spoiler]
