-
IGN is silly but at least they don't try to mislead people
-
I guess they did give Pokemon a bad rating because it had a lot of water... But still.
-
Looking into it (AKA reading the review and not just the blurb at the end), I saw that the reviewer really meant she felt there were too many water types, creating an imbalance towards grass types, as well as an abundance of water areas. She just summed it up terribly by writing "too much water".
-
I mean 7.8 still isn't a [i]bad[/i] rating
-
Yeah they aren't malicious like Polygon IMO