{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/7/2016 4:02:31 AM
19
1) you're both kids
2) finish highschool first before you even "pretend" to have real world troubles
3) if your significant other does not like how you use your spare time; [spoiler]your relationship is not ever going to work[/spoiler]
English
-
You might want to think just a little before making snap judgements. I met my wife when I was 16, married her at 18, and will be celebrating my 25th anniversary in 3 months. While I know this isn't anywhere near common, who are you to dismiss someone's relationship when you don't even know them? OP could be the next 70 year love story. Food for thought.
-
his significant other doesn't share his interests at all and highly disapproves of them; unless he is willing to give those interests up and change as a person (which 9 outa 10 ppl physically and psychologically can not do) then their relationship will be full of conflict for as long as it lasts whether its 9 months or 90 years also; in USA 40% of marriages are two people who met an fell in love in highschool so its pretty dang common also it is very much part of why divorcee rate in the USA is between 67-73%
-
They are two girls lmao, do you not know how to read?
-
Ill admit I didn't read the whole thing still the point i was trying to make does kinda apply
-
-
The uncommon part I referred to is a 25 year marriage. I know all about divorce rates, those come from people who don't take seriously enough the commitment or believe that it should be permanent. As far as interests, OPs gf is merely insecure; its not the gaming, its the time not centered on her. I've dealt with this myself, and its really not a deal breaker if they are willing to work on it and compromise with each other(the secret key to success in relationships).
-
well considering every highschooler is insecure I don't think thats much of a solution an yes long marriages are currently a rarity its got a lot more to do with the fact that mammals and humans are not actually monogamous creatures and that promiscuity is kinda hard wired into our DNA not to mention that with 7 billion ppl on earth an growing at 240 million more new ppl added to that every day AFTER accounting for the death rate coupled with the fact that we live 100% longer lives on avg than we did 100-200 years ago there's no longer any need to actually be monogamous
-
Social reasons, it's much better for children to be raised by a loving mother and father. Tbh if someone cheats then blames it on "mammals aren't meant to be monogamous" then they're just a weak willed person.
-
what im trying to explain is sex and a romantic relationship are in fact two different things. would you rather be raised in a strict monogamous religious home where the father abuses the wife an kids due to agitation and frustration with his romantic partner either not fulfilling his baser desires or from stress due to a clashing relationship that is not working but they refuse to separate an move on? yes kids with two parents are more successful and have less stress; only when both parents are happy and in a healthy relationship kids who grow up with two parents in an unhealthy relationship who will not separate suffer from either abuse or psychological trauma/illness 100% of the time http://www.newsweek.com/nearly-1-5-americans-suffer-mental-illness-each-year-230608 USA mental illness rate is 18.2% nearly 1 in 5 http://www.nationalchildrensalliance.org/media-room/media-kit/national-statistics-child-abuse children who experienced maltreatment or abuse, nearly 80% suffered neglect; 18% suffered physical abuse; and 9% suffered sexual abuse. so yea lets force every one to stay married for life so 1 in 5 can get abused 1 in 10 abused sexually and 100% of those abused to develop psychological illness or trauma by age 25. sounds like a real nice plan.
-
Romance and sex aren't two different things. This kind if thinking is why relationships break down and why the divorce rate is sky high, people are trying turn sex into a meaningless physical act that has no intimacy or mutual respect involved. You're entitled to your opinion, but if you think trust, love, intimacy and sex aren't intertwined, then I feel sorry for your future partners.
-
sex is the physical action of reproduction and is an activity most people do tend to recreationalize a romantic relationship is based on [b][i][u]LOVE[/u][/i][/b] which has absolutely nothing to do with sexual reproduction there are [b][i][u]plenty[/u][/i][/b] of people who have romantic relationships with absolutely no [b][i][u]SEX[/u][/i][/b] They are called any traditional religious person who refuse to engage in sexual activity prior to marriage also on [b][i][u]EVERY[/u][/i][/b] female profile page on [b][i][u]EVERY[/u][/i][/b] dating website you see; [quote]not looking for a hook up or a one night stand or sex, seeking a romantic long term relationship partner only[/quote] so yes sex and love are very much two different things
-
In your opinion, not in mine.
-
its not an opinion it's basically scientifically proven; you don't have to even like a person or have that person like you to have sex with that person in a romantic relationship both parties must have a love interest in the other or the relationship will not work. now do ppl in love with each other have intimate sexual contact; usually yes, im not debating or denying that. sex and love however are both very different.
-
There's no scientific proof for that, because it's subjective based on person to person opinion. I've never had sex with a woman that I didn't have romantic feelings for, and I've never been in a relationship that was void of sex. So me personally, they are intertwined. There's people out there who are married and willingly let their partners sleep with strangers, now I don't understand this, and I think it's a toxic relationship; but it's their life and their decision. If you ask them for their opinion, it will be different from mine and they most likely will disagree with me, but neither of us are objectively correct.
-
millions of people have sex for fun with no romance involved every single day; porno lingerie, cosplay & bedroom costumes sex toys erotic novels No Strings Attached hook ups and hook up classified ads and websites the film an tv industry hookers & escort services & prostitutes stripper bars ^---> all of the above indicate sex is a recreational activity people partake in within a relationship or not an as i said millions of people every day have romantic relationships with no sex involved; usually thats called dating. they are two different things and one does not need the other in order to be had with one or more people at a time. your personal experience and opinion is not the wholly and only definition used by the entire world in fact the [b][i][u]HOLY BIBLE[/u][/i][/b] states; sex is for reproduction and not recreation; any sex had for any purpose other than producing a child is a [b][i][u]SIN AGAINST GOD[/u][/i][/b] so even back in biblical days sex and love were considered to be different things.
-
That literally is all still opinion. Someone hiring a hooker doesn't make your opinion of sex objectively correct, and a woman dressing in sexy outfits to please her partner doesn't make sex void from love either. You have your perception, I have mine, leave it at that.
-
considering ive had NSA sex with ppl not only i did not like but ppl I actually did not even really know or get to know yea you don't need to be in love to have sex and people hire prostitutes and have sex with them every day those are not opinions those are actual facts ive also had both real and online/virtual relationships with ppl who i never had intimacy or sexting or cyber or actual sex with but was vastly in love with; also those same ppl i never had any intent to engage in sex with either. an millions of ppl do that every day too again not an opinion but actual fact.
-
You're too much of an idiot to comprehend what I'm saying, so I won't waste my time further.
-
really? so there are these things that exist called pornography and S&M bondage sex toys; those are strictly there for the recreationalizing of the act of sex and both have absolutely nothing to do with love. also a 2000 year old book called the holy bible even states that sex and love are different, not to mention every religion and scientist in the modern world, an yet you are the vastly superior knowledge holder when the entire world pretty much says you are wrong so how does that make me the idiot here?
