The EPA shouldn't exist in the first place, nor should chemicals vital to life be regulated. Also, this does not cause rising sea-levels, nor are they rising significantly.
English
-
You sound like Rick Santorum. "People say CO2 causes global warming but the plants need that to breathe, how can that be a bad thing?" Tell that to someone who's drowning. "They say all these people are drowning but water's necessary for life, how can that be a bad thing?" [url=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Trends_in_global_average_absolute_sea_level,_1870-2008_(US_EPA).png]Also your second statement isn't true.[/url]
-
[quote]I sound like a person with reason,[/quote]You sound like you belong in a mental ward. [quote]Everything I have said is true.[/quote]Not according to science and facts. [quote]Learn what significant means.[/quote]Really? The entire f*cking ocean getting bigger isn't significant?
-
Not at all, you are the only one that sounds insane. Yes, it is, at least the unbiased scientists. Not when the change is insignificant, no. It changes all the time. If you had a basic grasp of this subject you would understand these simple concepts.
-
[quote]Yes, it is, at least the unbiased scientists.[/quote]Then post some of these wonderful sources I can't seem to find in any respected scientific journals and end the argument instead of pussying out like last time. [quote]Not when the change is insignificant, no. It changes all the time. If you had a basic grasp of this subject you would understand these simple concepts.[/quote] [url=http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/critical-issues-sea-level-rise/]It's not insignificant.[/url]
-
[quote]Do a simple Google search.[/quote]You're not helping yourself. The only I came up with were global warming hoax sites without a single peer reviewed paper. That doesn't do anything. [quote]Except it is.[/quote]Not according to actual scientists.