I like Infinite Warfare, I feel it gets hated on for no good reason, but I can see it's problems (Skinny Bot, invisible walls, variants pussyfooting the pay2win line pretty close (I don't believe they're huge to the point you have a monumental advantage with a variant compared to without), and a futuristic CoD with jetpacks). I think Infinity Ward is the only consistent developer of CoD, the only bad (in my opinion) game they've developed has been Ghosts (I can't stand MW3 but I put that on SHG). Treyarch can make a hell of a campaign (minus Blops 3) and Zombies, but their multiplayers generally suffer from poor balancing and bad netcode. SHG is just a bad developer, their maps are more often than not pretty bad, their campaigns are 2 for 3 on being bland (and it's only because MW3 had something to go off of), their weapon balancing has been atrocious in all 3 of their games, and third modes that feel very confused (exo zombies feels really slapped together, survival in MW3 and AW is boring to me, WWII zombies fails miserably at creating a horror element, especially compared to Treyarch's zombies, or the sheer fun factor of IW zombies). All in all, I generally think Infinity Ward has good everything, with me recommending Treyarch for campaigns and zombies, reluctant to recommend 3arc based on multiplayer. SHG just sucks, they do, Raven and SHG should switch positions, in my opinion.