It’s consistently the top selling game every year. I’m personally not interested in them but they obviously have a fan base. I think it’s mainly popular with the sort of person that doesn’t usually play games. The majority of people that play COD are probably casual gamers that only buy one or two games a year. Which is fine. Some people don’t like a lot of complex mechanics or deep storytelling and 60 hour campaigns. They want to play an action packed 5 hour campaign and then shoot their friends in multiplayer. Some people want to watch a five hour Oscar nominated Martin Scorsese epic. Some people want to watch Transformers 15 and eat popcorn.

My thaughts[spoiler]For me, I just stopped caring after MW3. I realized I never liked how the campaigns where designed and multiplayer still had upgradable perks but weapons also needed to ''level up'' was tiring and borderline restrictive. The wave defence mode was ok, felt un-polished. Black ops 1 is and was my favourite 1 and nothing else has come close to how much I enjoyed that game. Call Of Duty now a days, is just a community war whether they want Boots on the ground or being able to fly in the sky's for however long they want. Not to mention the insane implantation of Lootboxes everywhere (even in the re-master). Meh they're ok to play but nothing for me to spend my 1 brain cell on. The zombie challenges feel like they've become more absurd and the story is never ending, My head hurts just thinking about that mess these days.[/spoiler]I wonder what other people find enjoyable about it these days and I'm not going to criticize you because it's all opinions.

I like Infinite Warfare, I feel it gets hated on for no good reason, but I can see it's problems (Skinny Bot, invisible walls, variants pussyfooting the pay2win line pretty close (I don't believe they're huge to the point you have a monumental advantage with a variant compared to without), and a futuristic CoD with jetpacks). I think Infinity Ward is the only consistent developer of CoD, the only bad (in my opinion) game they've developed has been Ghosts (I can't stand MW3 but I put that on SHG). Treyarch can make a hell of a campaign (minus Blops 3) and Zombies, but their multiplayers generally suffer from poor balancing and bad netcode. SHG is just a bad developer, their maps are more often than not pretty bad, their campaigns are 2 for 3 on being bland (and it's only because MW3 had something to go off of), their weapon balancing has been atrocious in all 3 of their games, and third modes that feel very confused (exo zombies feels really slapped together, survival in MW3 and AW is boring to me, WWII zombies fails miserably at creating a horror element, especially compared to Treyarch's zombies, or the sheer fun factor of IW zombies). All in all, I generally think Infinity Ward has good everything, with me recommending Treyarch for campaigns and zombies, reluctant to recommend 3arc based on multiplayer. SHG just sucks, they do, Raven and SHG should switch positions, in my opinion.

Last one I liked was MW2. It's just become an annualised game series which I think people are getting fed up of. They need to do what they did with Assassins Creed. Just give the series a break. Make something completely different. I mean damn even Dynasty Warriors is trying to reinvent itself at this point.

Nah. I think people are just waiting for Treyarch's next CoD entry. Let's be real. The reaction to WWII was okay-ish, but we all know that many gamers will flip for a new Black Ops.

If anything, I kinda wish they would just translate a fair portion of the single player portion of Infinite Warfare into an entire game, instead of having Infinite Warfare look like three or four games sharing the same title. Something like Angels Fall First and Shattered Horizons having a baby, but with a AAA budget. I guess my big dream is to just try drifting onto a giant spaceship so I can proceed to go space pirate on it’s insides.