I don't know what it is with people on here and talking like the are from the Harvard business school. But it sure is funny. The only brute force I really see is like I said. Its the people who are willing to say whatever they have to about whoever they have to to get what they want. If that's the kind of climate they cater to then this game will basically be like minding a kindergarten class all the time.

[quote]I don't know what it is with people on here and talking like the are from the Harvard business school. But it sure is funny. [/quote] The discussion is about how the game should be set up, not me or how you think I talk. Stay on topic.

Nah. I will focus on whatever topic I want to. Just like you do. And the topic that I'm focusing on is how you don't get to make all the rules and why its strange to me that you think you do. As far as I'm concerned what you have been saying is exactly why the game should not cater to a certain type of attitude towards it. Who's going to be in charge of managing all the gimmie gimmie gimmie that would emerge if they cater to that? Would you want that job? I don't particularly want to play a game that's all about giving people stuff simply because they want it or "rewarding" people for saying and believing things that aren't true. I think we've seen enough evidence for why you don't give entitled people everything they want just because they want it. You'll just multiply the entitled behavior.

Typically, when you resort to making your argument about the person you're arguing with, it means you're losing. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem]It's a well-known logical fallacy[/url]

I'm not "losing" anything that I don't care about winning. Like I said I could honestly care less because this is something that I don't need to google. And I'm not talking about only you, although its telling that you portray it that way. I'm talking about all of the entitled people who think there is something wrong simply because they can't have everything they want simply because they want it. Its childish and spoiled behavior to think the way some of you do and its obvious to any adult what it is you're trying to do. It simply comes down to the concept of merit. Its foolish to think that you should get the same thing as someone who does something more or better than you for doing nothing. You shouldn't get nothing for doing nothing but its silly that you would think that you should get everything for doing nothing or doing whatever it is that you choose to do as if you are the only person whose opinion matters.

[quote]Its foolish to think that you should get the same thing as someone who does something more or better than you for doing nothing.[/quote] I didn't propose getting something for doing nothing. I proposed getting something for doing something different. You're inventing your own version of my argument and then arguing against it - [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man]that's another logical fallacy[/url].