{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/19/2023 11:38:57 AM
10
"Crucible" needs to renamed
.......to simply "player vs player", and remove reference to the word "Crucible" from Destiny vernacular, because by definition there is no melting pot of trial. What does exist is a manipulative algorithm and construct that values things other than trial by fire.
-
1 RespuestaHow about ‘we are breaking up those teams’
-
1 RespuestaShaxx's Forced Win Ratio
-
1 RespuestaRed-headed stepchild would be more accurate.
-
1 RespuestaEditado por Jeidd: 7/19/2023 7:58:48 PMIf crucible were to be renamed to player than what would gambit be renamed to? Players vs everyone and players? PvEP
-
1 RespuestaName it Shaxx's Shitshow and call it a day.
-
1 RespuestaAha you got them! The best and coolest arguments are always made on etymology! SO based and cool and true! :DDDD
-
1 Respuestasemantic sammy over here
-
2 Respuestas"Manipulative" algorithm... Well, technically, yes. ANY matchmaking algorithm is "manipulative" because it determines, or manipulates, who matches with whom. You're basically saying the sky is blue!
-
8 RespuestasThe lore way back when spelled it out quite well, it's meaning isn't literal but as an allegory. Like the phrase "forged in the crucible of war", breaking and hardening men. That's exactly what Lord Shaxx wants because he'd rather have it done in his crucible then in battle when loss of life could be a certainty.
-
1 RespuestaHahaha yes, everything is manipulation, a solo player now has no control or sway on winning games.
